Skip directly to site content
Skip directly to page options
Skip directly to A-Z link
Skip directly to A-Z link
Skip directly to A-Z link
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
Search
×
NIOSH
NIOSH
All CDC
Submit
For a full list of topics:
A-Z Index
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Syndicate
NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search
Search Results
New Search
Advanced Search
Search Help
About NIOSHTIC-2
Feedback
Terms:
non-chemical risk assessment for lifting and low back pain based on bayesian threshold models
1 - 1 of
1
Bibliographic entries
All record(s) shown.
Save All
Save Page
View Saved
Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.
Back to Results
1
Non-chemical
risk
assessment
for
lifting
and
low
back
pain
based
on
Bayesian
threshold
models
.
Authors
Pandalai SP; Wheeler MW; Lu M-L
Source
Saf Health Work 2017 Jun; 8(2):206-211
Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.10.001
NIOSHTIC No.
20048938
Abstract
Background: Self-report
low
back
pain
(LBP) has been evaluated in relation to material handling
lifting
tasks, but little research has focused
on
relating quantifiable stressors to LBP at the individual level. The National Institute
for
Occupational Safety
and
Health (NIOSH) Composite
Lifting
Index (CLI) has been used to quantify stressors
for
lifting
tasks. A chemical exposure can be readily used as an exposure metric or stressor
for
chemical
risk
assessment
(RA). Defining
and
quantifying
lifting
non-chemical
stressors
and
related adverse responses is more difficult. Stressor-response
models
appropriate
for
CLI
and
LBP associations do not easily fit in common chemical RA modeling techniques (e.g. Benchmark Dose methods), so different approaches were tried. Methods: This work used prospective data from 138 manufacturing workers to consider the linkage of the occupational stressor of material
lifting
to LBP. The final model used a
Bayesian
random
threshold
approach to estimate the probability of an increase in LBP as a
threshold
step function. Results: Using maximal
and
mean CLI values, a significant increase in the probability of LBP
for
values above 1.5 was found. Conclusion: A
risk
of LBP associated with CLI values greater than 1.5 existed in this worker population. The relevance
for
other populations requires further study.
Keywords
Risk
assessment
; Analytical
models
; Mathematical
models
; Statistical analysis; Musculoskeletal system disorders; MSD; Musculoskeletal disorders; MSD;
Low
back
disorders;
Low
back
pain
; Materials handling; Manual
lifting
; Manual materials handling;
Lifting
; Task performance; Physical stress; Physical capacity; NIOSH
Lifting
Equation; Quantitative analysis; Quantitative
risk
assessment
; Author Keywords: Bayes theorem; musculoskeletal diseases; occupational exposure;
risk
assessment
Contact
Sudha P. Pandalai, MD, Centers
for
Disease Control
and
Prevention, National Institute
for
Occupational Safety
and
Health, Education
and
Information Division, MS C-15, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45226
CODEN
SWHAAF
Publication Date
20170601
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
SPandalai@cdc.gov
Fiscal Year
2017
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
2
ISSN
2093-7911
NIOSH Division
EID; DART
Source Name
Safety
and
Health at Work
State
OH
Page 1 of 1
All record(s) shown.
Page last reviewed:
December 9, 2020
Content source:
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Education and Information Division