NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Advanced Search   Search Help   About NIOSHTIC-2    Feedback

Terms: 20062986   1 - 1 of 1 Bibliographic entries All record(s) shown.
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.
Additive manufacturing for occupational hygiene: a comprehensive review of processes, emissions, & exposures.
Authors
Stefaniak AB; Du Preez S; Du Plessis JL
Source
J Toxicol Environ Health B 2021 Jul; 24(5):173-222
NIOSHTIC No.
20062986
Abstract
This comprehensive review introduces occupational (industrial) hygienists and toxicologists to the seven basic additive manufacturing (AM) process categories. Forty-six articles were identified that reported real-world measurements for all AM processes, except sheet lamination. Particles released from powder bed fusion (PBF), material jetting (MJ), material extrusion (ME), and directed energy deposition (DED) processes exhibited nanoscale to submicron scale; real-time particle number (mobility sizers, condensation nuclei counters, miniDiSC, electrical diffusion batteries) and surface area monitors (diffusion chargers) were generally sufficient for these processes. Binder jetting (BJ) machines released particles up to 8.5 µm; optical particle sizers (number) and laser scattering photometers (mass) were sufficient for this process. PBF and DED processes (powdered metallic feedstocks) released particles that contained respiratory irritants (chromium, molybdenum), central nervous system toxicants (manganese), and carcinogens (nickel). All process categories, except those that use metallic feedstocks, released organic gases, including (but not limited to), respiratory irritants (toluene, xylenes), asthmagens (methyl methacrylate, styrene), and carcinogens (benzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde). Real-time photoionization detectors for total volatile organics provided useful information for processes that utilize polymer feedstock materials. More research is needed to understand 1) facility-, machine-, and feedstock-related factors that influence emissions and exposures, 2) dermal exposure and biological burden, and 3) task-based exposures. Harmonized emissions monitoring and exposure assessment approaches are needed to facilitate inter-comparison of study results. Improved understanding of AM process emissions and exposures is needed for hygienists to ensure appropriate health and safety conditions for workers and for toxicologists to design experimental protocols that accurately mimic real-world exposure conditions.
Keywords
Additive manufacturing; Systematic reviews; Nanoparticles; Nanoscale; Ultrafine particles; Industrial processes; Three dimensional printing; 3D printing; Printer-emitted particles; Industrial emission sources; Industrial hygiene; Author Keywords: 3D printing; gases; monitoring; particles; Process descriptions; research needs
Contact
A. B. Stefaniak, Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
CODEN
JTECFR
Publication Date
20210701
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
AStefaniak@cdc.gov
Fiscal Year
2021
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
5
ISSN
1093-7404
NIOSH Division
RHD
Priority Area
Manufacturing
Source Name
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews
State
WV
Page 1 of 1 All record(s) shown.
Page last reviewed: December 9, 2020
Content source: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Education and Information Division