Skip directly to site content
Skip directly to page options
Skip directly to A-Z link
Skip directly to A-Z link
Skip directly to A-Z link
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
Search
×
NIOSH
NIOSH
All CDC
Submit
For a full list of topics:
A-Z Index
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Syndicate
NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search
Search Results
New Search
Advanced Search
Search Help
About NIOSHTIC-2
Feedback
Terms:
20040274
1 - 1 of
1
Bibliographic entries
All record(s) shown.
Save All
Save Page
View Saved
Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.
1
Assessment of fall-arrest systems for scissor lift operators: computer modeling and manikin drop testing.
Authors
Pan CS; Powers JR; Hartsell JJ; Harris JR; Wimer BM; Dong RG; Wu JZ
Source
Hum Factors 2012 Jun; 54(3):358-372
Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811425024
NIOSHTIC No.
20040274
Abstract
Objective: The current study is intended to evaluate the stability of a scissor lift and the performance of various fall-arrest harnesses/lanyards during drop/fall-arrest conditions and to quantify the dynamic loading to the head/neck caused by fall-arrest forces. Background: No data exist that establish the efficacy of fall-arrest systems for use on scissor lifts or the injury potential from the fall incidents using a fall-arrest system. Method: The authors developed a multibody dynamic model of the scissor lift and a human lift operator model using ADAMSTM and LifeMODTM Biomechanics Human Modeler. They evaluated lift stability for four fall-arrest system products and quantified biomechanical impacts on operators during drop/fall arrest, using manikin drop tests. Test conditions were constrained to flat surfaces to isolate the effect of manikin-lanyard interaction. Results: The fully extended scissor lift maintained structural and dynamic stability for all manikin drop test conditions. The maximum arrest forces from the harnesses/lanyards were all within the limits of ANSI Z359.1. The dynamic loading in the lower neck during the fall impact reached a level that is typically observed in automobile crash tests, indicating a potential injury risk for vulnerable participants. Conclusion: Fall-arrest systems may function as an effective mechanism for fall injury protection for operators of scissor lifts. However, operators may be subjected to significant biomechanical loadings on the lower neck during fall impact. Application: Results suggest that scissor lifts retain stability under test conditions approximating human falls from predefined distances but injury could occur to vulnerable body structures.
Keywords
Fall-protection; Equipment-design; Equipment-reliability; Force; Human-factors-engineering; Humans; Computer-models; Performance-capability; Harnesses; Body-mechanics; Body-protection; Body-regions; Biodynamics; Biomechanical-engineering; Biomechanical-modeling; Machine-operation; Laboratory-testing; Testing-equipment; Equipment-operators; Machine-operators; Injury-prevention; Dynamic-structural-analysis; Hoisting-equipment; Risk-analysis; Author Keywords: fall-arrest systems; fall from elevation; scissor lifts; computer modeling; manikin drop tests; head/neck injuries; fall hazard assessment
Page 1 of 1
All record(s) shown.
Page last reviewed:
December 9, 2020
Content source:
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Education and Information Division