Skip directly to site content
Skip directly to page options
Skip directly to A-Z link
Skip directly to A-Z link
Skip directly to A-Z link
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
Search
×
NIOSH
NIOSH
All CDC
Submit
For a full list of topics:
A-Z Index
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Syndicate
NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search
Search Results
New Search
Advanced Search
Search Help
About NIOSHTIC-2
Feedback
Terms:
20036517
1 - 1 of
1
Bibliographic entries
All record(s) shown.
Save All
Save Page
View Saved
Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.
1
ROPS performance during field upset and static testing.
Authors
Harris JR; McKenzie EA Jr.; Etherton JR; Cantis DM; Ronaghi M
Source
J Agric Saf Health 2010 Jan; 16(1):5-18
Link
https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.29245
NIOSHTIC No.
20036517
Abstract
Agriculture remains one of the most hazardous occupations in the U.S. By conservative estimates, tractor overturns alone claim 120 lives annually. A rollover protective structure (ROPS) and a seatbelt are a highly effective engineering safety control that can prevent many of these fatalities and reduce the severity of injuries associated with tractor overturn. SAE J2194 is a consensus performance standard established for agricultural ROPS. According to this standard, satisfactory ROPS performance can be demonstrated through static testing, field upset testing, or impact testing. A previous modeling study suggested that static testing may underpredict the strain induced in a ROPS during a field upset. In the current study, field upset testing and laboratory static testing results were compared. Field upset testing included six rear and six side upset tests performed according to SAE J2194 guidelines. Additionally, static testing was performed on a ROPS of the same model. The results support findings from the modeling study. Near the lowest sections of the ROPS, the plastic strain resulting from rear upset testing exceeded the plastic strain from static testing for 18 of 24 data points. Conversely, the ROPS plastic strain from side upset testing was typically less than plastic strain from laboratory static testing. However, data indicate that the side upset test may not be very repeatable. This study suggests that the longitudinal loading energy criterion for static testing might not be a conservative predictor of rear upset ROPS response.
Keywords
Accident-rates; Accidents; Accident-statistics; Agricultural-industry; Agricultural-workers; Agriculture; Injuries; Laboratory-testing; Occupational-accidents; Occupational-hazards; Safety-belts; Safety-engineering; Safety-equipment; Statistical-analysis Tractors; Traumatic-injuries; Author Keywords: Overturn; Rollbar; Rollover; ROPS; Tractor
Page 1 of 1
All record(s) shown.
Page last reviewed:
December 9, 2020
Content source:
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Education and Information Division