Skip directly to site content
Skip directly to page options
Skip directly to A-Z link
Skip directly to A-Z link
Skip directly to A-Z link
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
Search
×
NIOSH
NIOSH
All CDC
Submit
For a full list of topics:
A-Z Index
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Syndicate
NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search
Search Results
New Search
Advanced Search
Search Help
About NIOSHTIC-2
Feedback
Terms:
20022401
1 - 1 of
1
Bibliographic entries
All record(s) shown.
Save All
Save Page
View Saved
Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.
1
Anthropometric differences among occupational groups.
Authors
Hsiao H; Long D; Snyder K
Source
Ergonomics 2002 Feb; 45(2):136-152
Link
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130110115372
NIOSHTIC No.
20022401
Abstract
The increasing demands for anthropometric information for the design of machinery and personal protective equipment to prevent occupational injuries has necessitated an understanding of the anthropometric differences to be found among occupations. This study identified differences in various body measurements between occupational groups in the USA, as determined in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Approximately 16,000 of its 32,900 subjects were associated with an occupational group. The analysis of the data showed that the body size, or body segment measurements, of some occupational groups differ significantly. For example, agricultural workers were shorter by an average of 2.5 cm in height, and had wider wrist breadths, than other workers. Female agricultural and manufacturing workers had larger waist circumferences than those in the 'other occupations' and 'all occupations' categories. Protective service workers (i.e. firefighters, police and guards) were taller and heavier (7 kg heavier for males and over 10 kg heavier for females) than those in all occupations combined. These differences and other deviations as well as some age-and-ethnicity-adjusted results were tabulated for users' reference. Researchers and designers who use anthropometric databases to evaluate human-machine interfaces and personal protective equipment (PPE) must use caution in selecting databases that are adequate for their occupational applications.
Keywords
Anthropometry; Personal-protective-equipment; Machine-operation; Occupational-hazards; Body-protection; Agricultural-workers; Fire-fighters; Police-officers; Age-groups; Racial-factors; Humans; Construction-workers; Author Keywords: Anthropometry; Occupation; Human size; Agriculture; Construction; Personal protective equipment
Page 1 of 1
All record(s) shown.
Page last reviewed:
December 9, 2020
Content source:
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Education and Information Division