If you cannot find anything that addresses your concerns, please contact us to see how we can help.
All NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation reports and other NIOSH publications are available at no cost.
You can either download a copy of the publication from the website or contact us for a copy.
For HHE reports, please send an email to HHERequestHelp@cdc.gov.
Information about all other NIOSH publications is available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pubs/.
We carefully review our reports prior to publication, but we do make errors from time to time.
We regret any typographical or other minor errors that you might find. If you find a substantive factual or data-related error, let us know.
Please send an email to HHERequestHelp@cdc.gov with the report number (ex. HHE 2013-0500-7500),
the authors' names, the error you are reporting, and the page number of the error. We will look into your comments,
fix confirmed errors, and repost the report. Thank you for your interest in the HHE Program.
HHE Search Results
1058 HHE reports were found based on your search terms. Reports are listed in order of year published with the most recently published reports listed first.
Year Published and Title
(1981) Copper Division, Southwire Company, Inc., Carrollton, Georgia. (Click to open report) A health hazard evaluation was conducted at the Copper Division of Southwire Company, Incorporated (SIC-3340) in Carrollton, Georgia on October 2 to 11, 1978. The evaluation was requested by an authorized employee representative to determine if employees were being exposed to toxic concentrations of chemicals. Personal and area air samples were monitored. Medical evaluations of 293 of the 300 employees included interviews, questionnaires, blood tests and neurological examinations. Lead (7439921)... (Click to show more)A health hazard evaluation was conducted at the Copper Division of Southwire Company, Incorporated (SIC-3340) in Carrollton, Georgia on October 2 to 11, 1978. The evaluation was requested by an authorized employee representative to determine if employees were being exposed to toxic concentrations of chemicals. Personal and area air samples were monitored. Medical evaluations of 293 of the 300 employees included interviews, questionnaires, blood tests and neurological examinations. Lead (7439921) concentrations in 10 of 47 personal air samples exceeded the previous OSHA standard of 200 micrograms per cubic meter; 37 exceeded the new OSHA standard of 50 micrograms per cubic meter. Copper (7440508) dusts in all 13 samples tested exceeded the OSHA standard of 1000 micrograms per cubic meter. Arsenic (7440382) concentrations in 2 of 10 samples tested exceeded the NIOSH recommended standard of 2 micrograms per cubic meter. Nickel (7440020) in 5 of 47 samples tested exceeded the NIOSH recommended standard of 15 micrograms per cubic meter. Cadmium (7440439) concentrations in 1 of 47 samples tested exceeded the NIOSH recommended standard of 40 micrograms per cubic meter. Medical evaluations revealed an increased prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms, weakness, fatigue, hand tremor, joint pain, throat pain and respiratory symptoms in employees working in dusty areas. The observed increases in blood pressure, Achilles tendon reflex and blood lead, copper, or zinc were not associated with metal dust exposure. The authors conclude that a serious hazard exists due to exposure to airborne metallic dust. They recommend engineering methods for metallic dust control, use of fume respirators when necessary, use of special clothing, and improved work practices.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Davis Bessie Nuclear Power Station, Toledo Edison Company, United Engineers and Contractors Company (UE and C), Oak Harbor, Ohio. (Click to open report) Personal air samples were analyzed and employees were given medical evaluations at Davis Bessie Nuclear Power Station (SIC-4911) in Oak Harbor, Ohio. Requests for evaluation were made by a union representative of the United Engineers and Contractors and a union representative of employees of Toledo Edison Company, working on site at the power station, to evaluate employee skin and scalp problems due to exposure to ceramic wood fibers. Preliminary surveys were conducted on September 24 and 25, 19... (Click to show more)Personal air samples were analyzed and employees were given medical evaluations at Davis Bessie Nuclear Power Station (SIC-4911) in Oak Harbor, Ohio. Requests for evaluation were made by a union representative of the United Engineers and Contractors and a union representative of employees of Toledo Edison Company, working on site at the power station, to evaluate employee skin and scalp problems due to exposure to ceramic wood fibers. Preliminary surveys were conducted on September 24 and 25, 1980 and a follow up survey was performed on October 16, 1980. Environmental evaluation consisted of gravimetric analyses of personal air samples for airborne ceramic wool fibers. A total of 400 production and maintenance workers and varying numbers of construction workers were exposed to the fibers during installation of insulation which was completed at the time of the survey. The three personal air samples showed no accumulation of particulates and fibers detected were nonrespirable. Medical evaluations were conducted in 52 workers and scalp scrapings were obtained from 43 workers. Thirty seven workers had histories suggestive of irritant dermatitis of the scalp; 24 workers had physical findings consistent with the diagnosis. Of the 43 scalp samples, 18 were contaminated with organisms of the gut, perineum, skin or respiratory tract. Dermatitis was directly related to the history of dust exposure. The authors conclude that a potential health hazard exists for employees from exposure to ceramic wool fiber. Recommendations include provision of handwashing facilities and protective clothing for employees, and installation of an impermeable covering for the ceramic wool fiber.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Department of Transportation, Augusta, Maine. (Click for full summary) Worker exposures to fibrous glass, formaldehyde (50000), and a wide range of amines and other compounds were surveyed on June 11, September 5, and October 20 and 21, 1980 at the Department of Transportation (SIC-9621) in Augusta, Maine. The evaluation was requested by the State Epidemiologist to investigate the cause of worker reports of headache, nose and throat irritation, and fatigue. Air and bulk samples were collected for analysis. The health records of five employees were reviewed. No fibr... (Click to show more)Worker exposures to fibrous glass, formaldehyde (50000), and a wide range of amines and other compounds were surveyed on June 11, September 5, and October 20 and 21, 1980 at the Department of Transportation (SIC-9621) in Augusta, Maine. The evaluation was requested by the State Epidemiologist to investigate the cause of worker reports of headache, nose and throat irritation, and fatigue. Air and bulk samples were collected for analysis. The health records of five employees were reviewed. No fibrous glass was detected. Formaldehyde concentrations ranged up to 0.125 part per million, compared with the OSHA 8 hour time weighted average standard of 3 parts per million. Also detected were acetic-acid (64197), formic-acid (64186), and dimethyl-acetamide (127195). Review of the medical records suggested that the workers' health complaints were occupationally related but were not due to fibrous glass exposure. The authors conclude that the reported symptoms are due to formaldehyde exposure. Recommendations include the removal of urea formaldehyde insulation and improvements in the fresh air volume of the building.
(Click to show less)
Contact us to obtain a copy of report TA-80-118-928.
(1981) Exxon Chemical Company, Pottsville, Pennsylvania. (Click to open report) Worker exposures to various chemicals were surveyed on June 12 and 13 and December 5, 1979 and in March, 1980 at Exxon Chemical (SIC- 3079) in Pottsville, Pennsylvania. The evaluation was requested by a representative of the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Air and bulk samples were collected, and 80 workers completed medical questionnaires along with blood lead (7439921) and urinary chromium (7440473) tests. Environmental and bu... (Click to show more)Worker exposures to various chemicals were surveyed on June 12 and 13 and December 5, 1979 and in March, 1980 at Exxon Chemical (SIC- 3079) in Pottsville, Pennsylvania. The evaluation was requested by a representative of the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Air and bulk samples were collected, and 80 workers completed medical questionnaires along with blood lead (7439921) and urinary chromium (7440473) tests. Environmental and bulk sample concentrations of ozone (10028156), lead-chromate (7758976), acetic- acid (64197), hydrocarbons, total dust, 2,6-di-t-butyl-p-cresol, lead, and chromium, butane (106978), pentane (109660), and n-hexane (110543) were either not detectable or were within acceptable limits. Blood lead and urinary chromium concentrations were less than 40 micrograms per 100 milliliters and less than 350 nanograms per milliliter, respectively. The authors conclude that no hazardous exposures exist at this facility. They recommend medical monitoring, provision of showers and changing rooms, prohibition of smoking, eating, and drinking in areas of chemical use, and reevaluation of the ventilation system for the blown film machine.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Federal Aviation Administration, New York Air Route Traffic Control Center, Ronkonkoma, New York. (Click to open report) Area air samples were analyzed for the presence of asbestos (1332214) at the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center in Ronkonkoma, New York on October 7, 1980. The evaluation was requested by the management to determine the potential asbestos exposure for an unspecified number of workers. Analysis of area samples for airborne asbestos failed to reveal any asbestos fibers. The author concludes that no hazard from exposure to asbestos fibers exists but recommends that periodic monitoring of spr... (Click to show more)Area air samples were analyzed for the presence of asbestos (1332214) at the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center in Ronkonkoma, New York on October 7, 1980. The evaluation was requested by the management to determine the potential asbestos exposure for an unspecified number of workers. Analysis of area samples for airborne asbestos failed to reveal any asbestos fibers. The author concludes that no hazard from exposure to asbestos fibers exists but recommends that periodic monitoring of sprayed on asbestos surfaces be implemented to ensure that no asbestos is dislodged.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) General Electric Company, Lynn, Massachusetts. (Click to open report) Worker exposures to copper (7440508) were surveyed on April 2 and 22 to 24, 1980, and medical evaluations were performed in July and December, 1980, at the General Electric Company (SIC-3621) in Lynn, Massachusetts. The evaluation was requested by a representative of the International Union on Electrical Workers, Local 201, on behalf of 29 copper job workers. Air samples were collected for copper and silver (7440224) analysis, and workers were interviewed and given comprehensive medical examinat... (Click to show more)Worker exposures to copper (7440508) were surveyed on April 2 and 22 to 24, 1980, and medical evaluations were performed in July and December, 1980, at the General Electric Company (SIC-3621) in Lynn, Massachusetts. The evaluation was requested by a representative of the International Union on Electrical Workers, Local 201, on behalf of 29 copper job workers. Air samples were collected for copper and silver (7440224) analysis, and workers were interviewed and given comprehensive medical examinations. Copper and silver concentrations in the air samples ranged from 0.1 to 0.683 and from compared to OSHA standards of 0.1mg/cu m for copper fume, 1.0mg/cu m for copper dusts and mists, and 0.01mg/cu m for silver. Most of the workers reported episodes of green discoloration of the skin and itching. All plasma copper concentrations were normal, and only one urinary copper concentration exceeded the normal limit. Blood chemistry was normal, and the few abnormalities of liver function seen could not be conclusively related to workplace exposures. The author concludes that copper exposure at this company has caused dermatologic problems among the workers. Recommendations are included for engineering and work practice improvements and discontinuance of the use of barrier creams.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Golden Gate Bridge District, San Francisco, California. (Click to open report) Environmental sampling data and noise measurements data were reviewed, and blood specimens were collected on August 6, and 16, 1980, at the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California, to determine employee exposures to lead (7439921), crystalline silica (7631869), and noise. A representative of the International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades, Painters Local 4, requested the evaluation on behalf of approximately 30 workers. Previous air samples revealed lead concentrations about ... (Click to show more)Environmental sampling data and noise measurements data were reviewed, and blood specimens were collected on August 6, and 16, 1980, at the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California, to determine employee exposures to lead (7439921), crystalline silica (7631869), and noise. A representative of the International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades, Painters Local 4, requested the evaluation on behalf of approximately 30 workers. Previous air samples revealed lead concentrations about 100 times the OSHA standard of 0.05 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/cum). One sample for crystalline silica was 2.74mg/cum, compared with the CAL/OSHA calculated standard of 2.73mg/cum. A previous audiometric screening indicated occupational hearing loss among 38 percent of those tested. All blood lead concentrations were below the NIOSH recommended limit for occupationally exposed workers of 40 micrograms per deciliter. Lung function test revealed no restrictive disease, and the four cases of mild obstructive disease that were discovered had normal chest X-rays of the 29 subjects X- rayed, four abnormal individuals were identified but none of the abnormalities were indicative of silica related disease. The authors conclude that there was no lead or silica related hazards, although a significant amount of occupational hearing loss was noted. They recommend medical monitoring of workers exposed to lead, crystalline silica, and excessive noise levels, implementation of a noise control program, workers education, and use of double lens air hoods.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Greif Brothers Corporation, Niagara Falls, New York. (Click to open report) Environmental samples were analyzed for mirex (2385855) and lindane (58899) at Greif Brothers Corporation in Niagara Falls, New York on March 6, 1981. A representative of the United Steel Workers of America, Local 12256 requested the evaluation on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Three samples of dust collected from horizontal surfaces in the facility failed to reveal any quantifiable amounts of mirex or lindane. The author concludes that a hazard from mirex and lindane exposure does ... (Click to show more)Environmental samples were analyzed for mirex (2385855) and lindane (58899) at Greif Brothers Corporation in Niagara Falls, New York on March 6, 1981. A representative of the United Steel Workers of America, Local 12256 requested the evaluation on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Three samples of dust collected from horizontal surfaces in the facility failed to reveal any quantifiable amounts of mirex or lindane. The author concludes that a hazard from mirex and lindane exposure does not exist at this facility.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Grundy Industries, Inc., Denver, Colorado. (Click to open report) Environmental and breathing zone air samples were analyzed for asbestos (1332214) at Grundy Industries, Incorporated (SIC-2952) in Denver, Colorado, on August 19, 1981. The evaluation was requested by the firm's owner on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Asbestos concentrations ranged from nondetected to 0.15 fibers greater than five microns in length per cubic centimeter (F/CC). The average exposure was 0.07 F/CC, none of the samples exceeded the OSHA standard of two F/CC. The author ... (Click to show more)Environmental and breathing zone air samples were analyzed for asbestos (1332214) at Grundy Industries, Incorporated (SIC-2952) in Denver, Colorado, on August 19, 1981. The evaluation was requested by the firm's owner on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Asbestos concentrations ranged from nondetected to 0.15 fibers greater than five microns in length per cubic centimeter (F/CC). The average exposure was 0.07 F/CC, none of the samples exceeded the OSHA standard of two F/CC. The author concludes that no health hazard from exposure to asbestos did exist at this facility. He recommends the prohibition of eating, drinking, and smoking in areas where processing or handling of asbestos is taking place and worker education regarding asbestos hazards.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Guilford School, Cincinnati, Ohio. (Click to open report) Personal and environmental air samples were analyzed for asbestos (1332214), and asbestos removal procedures were evaluated at the Guilford School (SIC-8210), in Cincinnati, Ohio, on September 30, 1981, and on October 1, 1981. An unidentified individual requested the evaluation on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. All air samples were below the detectable limit. The author concludes that the protective measures enacted by the contractor removing the asbestos from pipes were adequate to... (Click to show more)Personal and environmental air samples were analyzed for asbestos (1332214), and asbestos removal procedures were evaluated at the Guilford School (SIC-8210), in Cincinnati, Ohio, on September 30, 1981, and on October 1, 1981. An unidentified individual requested the evaluation on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. All air samples were below the detectable limit. The author concludes that the protective measures enacted by the contractor removing the asbestos from pipes were adequate to prevent asbestos contamination. He recommends the use of partitions in the work area, establishment of clean and dirty change of clothes areas, sealing of all duct work, wetting of settled dusts, use of NIOSH approved respirators, and adherence to prescribed standards for asbestos removal to minimize any potential hazards.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
