If you cannot find anything that addresses your concerns, please contact us to see how we can help.
All NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation reports and other NIOSH publications are available at no cost.
You can either download a copy of the publication from the website or contact us for a copy.
For HHE reports, please send an email to HHERequestHelp@cdc.gov.
Information about all other NIOSH publications is available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pubs/.
We carefully review our reports prior to publication, but we do make errors from time to time.
We regret any typographical or other minor errors that you might find. If you find a substantive factual or data-related error, let us know.
Please send an email to HHERequestHelp@cdc.gov with the report number (ex. HHE 2013-0500-7500),
the authors' names, the error you are reporting, and the page number of the error. We will look into your comments,
fix confirmed errors, and repost the report. Thank you for your interest in the HHE Program.
HHE Search Results
1058 HHE reports were found based on your search terms. Reports are listed in order of year published with the most recently published reports listed first.
Year Published and Title
(1981) American Standard, Inc., Louisville, Kentucky. (Click for full summary) Personal and environmental air samples were analyzed for metal fumes, respirable dust and silica (7631869), carbon-monoxide (630080), and environmental temperatures were measured at American Standard, Incorporated (SIC-3479) in Louisville, Kentucky on July 14 to 16 and September 22 to 24, 1980. In addition, medical questionnaires were administered and blood lead (7439921) concentrations were analyzed. The potential threat of Legionnaires Disease was also stressed. An authorized employee represen... (Click to show more)Personal and environmental air samples were analyzed for metal fumes, respirable dust and silica (7631869), carbon-monoxide (630080), and environmental temperatures were measured at American Standard, Incorporated (SIC-3479) in Louisville, Kentucky on July 14 to 16 and September 22 to 24, 1980. In addition, medical questionnaires were administered and blood lead (7439921) concentrations were analyzed. The potential threat of Legionnaires Disease was also stressed. An authorized employee representative requested the evaluation of behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Atmospheric lead concentrations ranged from 26 to 162 micrograms per cubic meter, compared with the NIOSH recommended standard of 50 micrograms per cubic meter as an eight hour time weighted average. Carbon-monoxide and silica concentrations were not found in toxic concentrations. Heat stress measurements with a wet bulb globe thermometer (WBGT) ranged from 86 degrees F to 102 degrees F WBGT. The NIOSH recommended criteria for occupational exposure to hot environments requires that certain work practices be initiated when the exposure is continuous for one hour and the time weighted average WBGT exceeds 79 degrees F for men or 76 degrees F for women. The clinical presentation of employee symptoms was not typical of Legionellosis. Eight enamelers had blood lead concentrations greater than 39 micrograms per milliliter. The 116 other employees all had blood lead concentrations below 40 micrograms per milliliter, considered the upper limit of normal. The authors conclude that the principle cause of employee symptoms was the extremely hot working environment, and that elevated atmospheric lead concentrations, contributed to increasing blood lead in some enamelers. They recommend several measures to reduce heat stress, a reduction of dust concentrations, implementation of good housekeeping, and medical monitoring of affected workers.
(Click to show less)
Contact us to obtain a copy of report HHE-80-199-948.
(1981) ASARCO, Inc., Hayden, Arizona. (Click to open report) Worker exposures to arsenic (7440382) (As), cadmium (7440439) (Cd), copper (7440508) (Cu), lead (7439921) (Pb) and sulfur-dioxide (7446095) (SO2) were surveyed at ASARCO, Incorporated (SIC-3331) in Hayden, Arizona on April 23 and 24, 1980. The evaluation was requested by an authorized representative of the United Steel Workers, Local 886, on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Personal and area air samples were collected in the pug mill department, and workers were tested for blood Pb an... (Click to show more)Worker exposures to arsenic (7440382) (As), cadmium (7440439) (Cd), copper (7440508) (Cu), lead (7439921) (Pb) and sulfur-dioxide (7446095) (SO2) were surveyed at ASARCO, Incorporated (SIC-3331) in Hayden, Arizona on April 23 and 24, 1980. The evaluation was requested by an authorized representative of the United Steel Workers, Local 886, on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Personal and area air samples were collected in the pug mill department, and workers were tested for blood Pb and urinary As concentrations. All four personal samples for As exceeded the OSHA standard of 10 micrograms per cubic meter, one sample exceeded the Cu dust standard of 1 milligram per cubic meter (mg/cu m), and one sample exceeded the Pb standard of 50 micrograms per cubic meter. Exposures to Cd fume, Cd dust, and SO2 were below the respective OSHA standard of 0.2mg/cu m, 1.0mg/cu m, and 5 parts per million. One worker had a urinary As concentration that exceeded 100 micrograms per liter, and two others had urinary As concentrations greater than 50 micrograms per 100 milliliters. The authors conclude that no excessive Pb exposure exists, but one worker may be exposed to hazardous As concentrations. They recommend that OSHA regulations regarding exposures to As and Pb be consulted, equipment be properly maintained, ventilation be provided, urine sampling be conducted periodically, and workers be educated about the health hazards related to As and Pb.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) AT and T Longlines, Raggersville, Ohio. (Click to open report) Worker exposures to polychlorinated-biphenyls (1336363) (PCB), asbestos (1332214), contaminated drinking water, and incident nonionizing radiation were surveyed on February 4, 1980 at the AT and T Longlines facility (SIC-4899) in Raggersville, Ohio. The evaluation was requested by the Communication Workers of America, Local 4354, on behalf of the three telecommunications technicians. Survey methods were not reported. No detectable levels of radiation were found, and no asbestos was recovered. Po... (Click to show more)Worker exposures to polychlorinated-biphenyls (1336363) (PCB), asbestos (1332214), contaminated drinking water, and incident nonionizing radiation were surveyed on February 4, 1980 at the AT and T Longlines facility (SIC-4899) in Raggersville, Ohio. The evaluation was requested by the Communication Workers of America, Local 4354, on behalf of the three telecommunications technicians. Survey methods were not reported. No detectable levels of radiation were found, and no asbestos was recovered. Polyisobutylene (9003274) impregnated paper was identified as the PCB containing material. Mutagenicity testing of the drinking water was negative. The author concludes that no asbestos, PCB, radiation, or contamination hazards exist at this facility.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Bethelehem Steel Corporation, Chesterton, Indiana. (Click to open report) Personal air samples were analyzed for total particulate concentrations, iron-oxide fumes, and particulate inorganic fluorides, at the Bethelehem Steel Corporation (SIC-3312), in Chesterton, Indiana, on June 3 to 6, 1980. A representative of the United Steelworkers of America, Local 6787, requested the evaluation on behalf of approximately 20 affected workers in the continuous castor shop. Total particulate concentrations ranged from 0.8 to 2.2 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/CuM), compared with ... (Click to show more)Personal air samples were analyzed for total particulate concentrations, iron-oxide fumes, and particulate inorganic fluorides, at the Bethelehem Steel Corporation (SIC-3312), in Chesterton, Indiana, on June 3 to 6, 1980. A representative of the United Steelworkers of America, Local 6787, requested the evaluation on behalf of approximately 20 affected workers in the continuous castor shop. Total particulate concentrations ranged from 0.8 to 2.2 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/CuM), compared with the OSHA standard of 15mg/CuM. Iron-oxide concentrations were in the range of 0.04 to 1.0mg/CuM, with the OSHA standard being 10mg/CuM. Fluoride concentrations ranged from 0.04 to 1.7mg/CuM, compared with the OSHA standard of 2.5mg/CuM. Seventeen of the 20 workers interviewed reported one or more acute, intermittent work related health problems, predominately respiratory tract and mucous membrane irritation. The authors conclude that a health hazard from particulate or iron-oxide fume did not exist at this facility, although they suggest that workers were exposed to irritant concentrations of fluorides. They recommend that additional environmental monitoring be conducted and that appropriate respiratory protection be provided to all workers during periods of increased dust generation.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Bulk Mail Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Click to open report) Worker exposure to noise and asbestos (1332214) were surveyed on July 28 to 30, 1981 at the Bulk Mail Center (SIC-4311) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The evaluation was requested by the company management on behalf of about 650 employees. Bulk and breathing zone samples were analyzed for asbestos, and noise levels were monitored in the noisiest areas of the facility. Bulk samples of the brake and clutch from the mail conveyor system and of sheet rock from the welding room contained 20 to 75 perce... (Click to show more)Worker exposure to noise and asbestos (1332214) were surveyed on July 28 to 30, 1981 at the Bulk Mail Center (SIC-4311) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The evaluation was requested by the company management on behalf of about 650 employees. Bulk and breathing zone samples were analyzed for asbestos, and noise levels were monitored in the noisiest areas of the facility. Bulk samples of the brake and clutch from the mail conveyor system and of sheet rock from the welding room contained 20 to 75 percent chrysotile- asbestos, however no asbestos was detected in personal breathing zone samples. Noise levels at all locations were below the OSHA limit of 90 decibels relative to the A-weighted scale. The author concludes that no asbestos or noise exposure hazards exist at this facility. Recommendations are included for control of potential asbestos and noise hazards.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Centers For Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia. (Click to open report) Employee exposures to xylene (1330207), ethyl-alcohol (64175), formaldehyde (50000) and asbestos (1332214) were evaluated at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (SIC-9199) in Atlanta, Georgia on October 9 and 10, 1980. The measurements were made in response to a request from the Office of Biosafety at CDC to evaluate employee exposure to organic solvents and asbestos. Personal and area samples for evaluating exposure to organic solvents were analyzed by gas chromatography; asbestos was estimat... (Click to show more)Employee exposures to xylene (1330207), ethyl-alcohol (64175), formaldehyde (50000) and asbestos (1332214) were evaluated at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (SIC-9199) in Atlanta, Georgia on October 9 and 10, 1980. The measurements were made in response to a request from the Office of Biosafety at CDC to evaluate employee exposure to organic solvents and asbestos. Personal and area samples for evaluating exposure to organic solvents were analyzed by gas chromatography; asbestos was estimated by polarized light microscopy and dispersion staining techniques. In five area and personal samples, xylene concentrations ranged from 1 to 5 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/cu m); the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL) is 435mg/cu m on a 8 hour time weighted average. Ethyl- alcohol ranged from 6 to 8mg/cu m; the OSHA PEL for ethyl alcohol is 1900mg/cu m. Formaldehyde ranged from 1 to 3mg/cu m, exceeding the NIOSH ceiling limit of 1.2mg/cu m for a 30 minute average. No asbestos fibers were found in air samples, but 6 of 13 bulk insulation samples contained chrysotile asbestos in concentrations 5 to 60 percent. The author concludes that a health hazard exists at CDC from overexposure to formaldehyde, and six areas have a potential for airborne asbestos exposure. Recommendations include the provision of adequate ventilation to control formaldehyde vapors, the replacement of asbestos insulation, provision of an employee education program, and provision of personal protective equipment.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) CF and I Steel Corporation, Pueblo, Colorado. (Click to open report) Breathing zone and environmental air samples were analyzed for calcium-oxide (1305788) at the CF and I Steel Corporation (SIC-3315) in Pueblo, Colorado, on March 18, 1981. A representative of the United Steelworkers of America, Local 2102, requested the evaluation on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Calcium-oxide concentrations ranged from 0.8 to 5.8 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/cum), compared with the OSHA standard of 5.0mg/cum. Interviews with workers revealed that the only consis... (Click to show more)Breathing zone and environmental air samples were analyzed for calcium-oxide (1305788) at the CF and I Steel Corporation (SIC-3315) in Pueblo, Colorado, on March 18, 1981. A representative of the United Steelworkers of America, Local 2102, requested the evaluation on behalf of an unspecified number of workers. Calcium-oxide concentrations ranged from 0.8 to 5.8 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/cum), compared with the OSHA standard of 5.0mg/cum. Interviews with workers revealed that the only consistent complaint was irritation of the nose and throat. The author concludes that a potential health hazard exists from exposure to calcium-oxide. They recommend the prohibition of eating, drinking and smoking in the work area, good personal hygiene, periodic medical examination for all affected workers, and continuance of dust vacuuming practices
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Cincinnati Bulk Mail Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. (Click to open report) Environmental and personal air samples were analyzed for nuisance dusts at the Cincinnati Bulk Mail Center (SIC-3579), in Cincinnati, Ohio, on June 16, 17, and 22, 1981. The evaluation was requested by the management to determine the potential exposure of approximately 750 employees. Respirable particulate concentrations ranged from particulate concentrations ranged from 0.06 to 0.29mg/cum. All exposures were well below the OSHA standard of 5mg/cum for respirable particulates and 15mg/cum for to... (Click to show more)Environmental and personal air samples were analyzed for nuisance dusts at the Cincinnati Bulk Mail Center (SIC-3579), in Cincinnati, Ohio, on June 16, 17, and 22, 1981. The evaluation was requested by the management to determine the potential exposure of approximately 750 employees. Respirable particulate concentrations ranged from particulate concentrations ranged from 0.06 to 0.29mg/cum. All exposures were well below the OSHA standard of 5mg/cum for respirable particulates and 15mg/cum for total particulates. Analysis of area organic samples taken inside the catalog truck revealed toluene (108883) and xylene (1330207), concentrations ranging from 18 to 22mg/cum and 24 to 29mg/cum respectively. OSHA total standards for toluene and xylene are 750 and 435mg/cum, respectively. Total hydrocarbon concentrations ranged from 26 to 29mg/cum. The author concludes that a health hazard from air particulates did not exist at this facility and that health complaints reported by dock workers were caused by exposure to toluene, xylene, and minor amounts of other hydrocarbons which volatilized from printing inks. She recommends shipping of newly printed material in trailers which have ventilation ports, airing of newly printed materials, and regular cleaning and maintenance of dust collecting systems on the sack shake out machines.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Cincinnati Water Treatment Plant, Cincinnati, Ohio. (Click to open report) Worker exposures to carbon (7440440) dust and organic vapors were surveyed on March 9 to 11, 1981 at the Cincinnati Water Treatment Station (SIC-4941) in Cincinnati, Ohio. The evaluation was requested by the City Health and Safety Director on behalf of five employees involved in the carbon regeneration process. Area and personal breathing zone samples were collected along with bulk samples. Noise levels also were measured. Exposures to respirable carbon dust ranged from 0.06 to 0.29 milligram pe... (Click to show more)Worker exposures to carbon (7440440) dust and organic vapors were surveyed on March 9 to 11, 1981 at the Cincinnati Water Treatment Station (SIC-4941) in Cincinnati, Ohio. The evaluation was requested by the City Health and Safety Director on behalf of five employees involved in the carbon regeneration process. Area and personal breathing zone samples were collected along with bulk samples. Noise levels also were measured. Exposures to respirable carbon dust ranged from 0.06 to 0.29 milligram per cubic meter (mg/cu m), well below the OSHA standard of 5mg/cu m for an 8 hour day. No organic vapors were detected. The greatest noise level measured was 84.4 decibels relative to the A-weighted scale (dBA), below the OSHA limit of 90dBA for an 8 hour workday. The author concludes that no health hazards exist at this facility. The continued use of respirators is recommended along with soundproofing of the enclosed operator's booth if the facility is expanded to full scale operation.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
(1981) Colorado Springs Public Utilities, Colorado Springs, Colorado. (Click to open report) Worker exposures to various dusts, metals, and chemicals were surveyed on February 9 to 20, 1981 at two coal fired electrical power generating stations (SIC-4911) in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The evaluation was requested by the City of Colorado Springs Department of Public Utilities on behalf of the 72 workers at the Martin Drake and R.D. Nixon facilities. Breathing zone and area air samples were collected for analysis. Workers were exposed to fly ash and coal dust containing respirable free s... (Click to show more)Worker exposures to various dusts, metals, and chemicals were surveyed on February 9 to 20, 1981 at two coal fired electrical power generating stations (SIC-4911) in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The evaluation was requested by the City of Colorado Springs Department of Public Utilities on behalf of the 72 workers at the Martin Drake and R.D. Nixon facilities. Breathing zone and area air samples were collected for analysis. Workers were exposed to fly ash and coal dust containing respirable free silica at concentrations that exceeded the respective OSHA standards of 5.0 and 2.0 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/cu m). Exposures to arsenic (7440382) also exceeded the OSHA standard of 0.01mg/cu m. Exposures to up to 0.1 part per million of hydrazine (302012) were detected when the agent was added to dilution vessels. No hazardous exposures to trace metals, chlorine (7782505), asbestos (1332214), amines, or mercury (7439976) were identified. Sulfur-dioxide (7446095) exposures were below the OSHA limit of 13mg/cu m, but exceeded the NIOSH limit of 1.3mg/cu m. The author concludes that workers at these power stations are exposed to hazardous amounts of free silica in fly ash and coal dust, arsenic, hydrazine, and sulfur- dioxide. Recommendations are included for the use of respiratory protection, medical surveillance, hazard area designation, and engineering improvements.
(Click to show less) (Click to open report)
