Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Health Hazard Evaluations (HHEs)

Search HHE Reports

Search for your topic in the box below. Enter search terms separated by spaces.


You can also search by selecting from one or more of the filters below.
You can use these filters alone or in addition to search terms entered in the search box above.


If you cannot find anything that addresses your concerns, please contact us to see how we can help.

All NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation reports and other NIOSH publications are available at no cost. You can either download a copy of the publication from the website or contact us for a copy. For HHE reports, please send an email to HHERequestHelp@cdc.gov. Information about all other NIOSH publications is available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pubs/.

We carefully review our reports prior to publication, but we do make errors from time to time. We regret any typographical or other minor errors that you might find. If you find a substantive factual or data-related error, let us know. Please send an email to HHERequestHelp@cdc.gov with the report number (ex. HHE 2013-0500-7500), the authors' names, the error you are reporting, and the page number of the error. We will look into your comments, fix confirmed errors, and repost the report. Thank you for your interest in the HHE Program.

HHE Search Results

1060 HHE reports were found based on your search terms. Reports are listed in order of year published with the most recently published reports listed first.


Year Published and Title

(1982) Simmons, U. S. A., Columbus, Ohio. (Click for full summary)
Environmental sampling to assess employee exposure to cotton dust was conducted at Simmons, U.S.A. (SIC-2515) in Columbus, Ohio, on October 29 and November 30 through December 3, 1981. The evaluation was requested by management on behalf of 15 affected employees. The OSHA permissible exposure limit for cotton dust is 500 micrograms per cubic meter (microg/m3). Average concentrations detected ranged from 110 to 455microg/m3. The authors conclude that exposures do not exceed the present OSHA stand... (Click to show more)

Contact us to obtain a copy of report HETA-81-406-1150.

(1982) Supplement, Colorado River Indian Reservation, Cotton Gin Study, Colorado River Gin, Poston, Arizona. (Click for full summary)
Results and conclusions of initial and followup evaluations conducted on one of three cotton gins on the Colorado River Indian Reservation in Poston, Arizona were presented. Cotton dust levels in the Colorado River Gin exceeded the NIOSH and OSHA recommended standards in all but one sample. Pesticide residues were identified in samples of first picked cotton, cotton bolls, trash cotton, seeds, motes, waste/bract cotton, finished cotton, and rafter samples. Levels of nuisance dust ranged from 2.6... (Click to show more)

Contact us to obtain a copy of report HHE-80-245-1210.

(1982) Supplement, Colorado River Indian Reservation, Cotton Gin Study, Parker Valley Gin, Parker, Arizona. (Click for full summary)
Results and conclusions of initial and followup evaluations conducted on one of three cotton gins on the Colorado River Indian Reservation in Arizona were presented. Cotton dust levels at the Parker Valley Gin exceeded NIOSH and OSHA recommended levels in all but one sample. Pesticide residues were identified in samples of first picked cotton, cotton bolls, trash cotton, seeds, motes, waste/bract cotton, finished cotton, and rafter samples. Levels of nuisance dust ranged from 2.0 to 10.5mg/m3. N... (Click to show more)

Contact us to obtain a copy of report HHE-80-247-1210.

(1982) Supplement, Colorado River Indian Reservation, Cotton Gin Study, Plantation Gin, Poston, Arizona. (Click for full summary)
Results and conclusions of initial and followup evaluations conducted on one of three cotton gins on the Colorado River Indian Reservation in Poston, Arizona were presented. Cotton dust levels at the Plantation Gin exceeded NIOSH and OSHA recommended levels in all but one sample. Pesticide residues were identified in samples of first picked cotton, cotton bolls, trash cotton, seeds, motes, waste/bract cotton, finished cotton, and rafter samples. Levels of nuisance dust ranged from 0.25 to 1.6mg/... (Click to show more)

Contact us to obtain a copy of report HHE-80-246-1210.

(1982) Todd Meadows Gin, St. Clair, Alabama. (Click to open report)
Occupational exposure to chemical sprays used on cotton plants prior to cotton ginning was investigated at the Todd Meadows Gin (SIC- who complained of respiratory distress; unconsciousness, chills, memory lapse, and double vision. The study was conducted on February 4, 1982. The ginning and baling of the cotton normally involves five workers. At the time of the study the gin was not operating, so the description of operations and estimates of expected dust exposures were based on judgment and i... (Click to show more)

(1982) U. S. Postal Service, Washington Bulk Mail Center, Washington, D.C. (Click to open report)
Exposures to asbestos (1332214) and other potential health hazards at the Washington Bulk Mail Center (SIC-4311) in Washington, D.C. were evaluated. The evaluation was requested by the United States Postal Service on behalf of 130 maintenance personnel, and was conducted on August 3 and 4, 1981. Personal air samples for asbestos and respirable particulates were collected and area noise levels were measured. Respirable particulates ranged from 0.03 to standard of 5.0mg/m3. Asbestos concentration ... (Click to show more)

(1982) U.S. Army Research Office, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. (Click to open report)
Potential hazardous exposure to chemicals used in operating and cleaning the duplicating equipment at the United States Army Research Office (SIC-2752), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina was investigated. Noise levels were also analyzed. The research office requested the study which was performed in March, April, May, and July of 1982. Two employees normally operate the printing equipment. Seven personal and area samples collected in the printing room were assayed for 20 organic chemicals. ... (Click to show more)

(1982) U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Click to open report)
A health hazard evaluation of asbestos (1332214) concentrations in leased offices of the United States Department of Justice (SIC- 9100), Washington, D.C. was conducted. The study was requested by the Antitrust Division and was performed on February 16, 1982. Four area air samples and two bulk samples of ceiling material and settled dust were collected. No asbestos was found in any of the area air samples or in the settled dust. Ceiling material was found to contain 5 percent chrysotile asbestos... (Click to show more)

(1982) U.S. Secret Service, Washington, D.C. (Click to open report)
The possible health hazards to United States Secret Service officers of exposure to airborne lead (7439921) during the use of an indoor firing range (SIC-922), Washington, D.C., and Beltsville, Maryland were investigated. The Safety Division of the Department of Treasury requested the study which was performed on May 5, 1982. Four shooters at the Beltsville Range were exposed to an 8 hour average (TWA) lead concentration of 38 micrograms per cubic meter (microg/m3). During a 25 minute period the... (Click to show more)

(1982) Unistil Corporation, Millville, NJ. (Click for full summary)
Silica (7631869) exposure and silicosis among workers at a silica production facility (SIC-2819) were investigated by NIOSH in 1980. Area and personal samples were collected and former and current workers were radiographically screened for silicosis. The median concentration of respirable crystalline silica meter. The range was from undetectable amounts of dust to 350 micrograms per cubic meter. Concentrations in the silo and millroom exceeded NIOSH standards. Out of 47 past and present workers,... (Click to show more)

Contact us to obtain a copy of report MTA-80-103-4.


Page 69 of 106 (Results 681-690 of 1060)   First   « Prev   67   68   69   70   71   79   Next »   Last


Haven't found what you are looking for? Try different criteria, a new search or contact us.
TOP