Mass Antibiotic Dispensing: Streamlining POD Design and Operations

Originally aired April 14, 2005

 

CDC 0414.05

>>> CDC, OUR PLANNERS AND OUR PRESENTERS WISH TO

DISCLOSE THEY HAVE NO FINANCIAL INTEREST OR OTHER RELATIONSHIP

WITH THE MANUFACTURERS OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, SUPPLIERS OF

COMMERCIAL SERVICES OR COMMERCIAL SUPPORTERS.

PRESENTATIONS WILL NOT INCLUDE ANY DISCUSSION OF THE UNLABELED

USE OF A PRODUCT OR A PRODUCT UNDER INVESTIGATIONAL USE.

>>> WELCOME TO THE THIRD SATELLITE BROADCAST IN OUR MASS

DISPENSING SERIES.

THE FIRST PROGRAM WAS A PRIMER THAT COVERED GENERAL CONCEPTS OF

MASS ANTIBIOTIC DISPENSING.

THE SECOND PROGRAM ADDRESSED RECRUITING, TRAINING, AND

MAINTAINING VOLUNTEERS.

THIS BROADCAST WILL PROVIDE YOU IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR

STREAMLINING AND IMPROVING THE OPERATION OF POINTS OF DISPENSING, OR PODS.

YOU MIGHT WONDER WHY THIS IS NECESSARY.

WELL, A TERRORIST ATTACK USING THE ANTHRAX BACTERIUM OR THE

SMALLPOX VIRUS WITHIN A DENSELY POPULATED AREA COULD REQUIRE THAT

HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE -- MAYBE MILLIONS -- RECEIVE

ANTIBIOTICS OR VACCINATIONS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.

FOR EXAMPLE, THE 21 MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS PARTICIPATING IN THE

PILOT PHASE OF THE CITIES READINESS INITIATIVE, OR CRI, SEEK TO

BE ABLE TO DISTRIBUTE ANTIBIOTICS TO THEIR ENTIRE POPULATIONS IF

NECESSARY WITHIN 48 HOURS OF DECIDING TO DO SO.

THIS IS A FORMIDABLE CHALLENGE, AND TO MEET IT, WE MUST FIND WAYS

TO DELIVER MASS PROPHYLAXIS MORE RAPIDLY THAN EVER BEFORE.

THIS BROADCAST HAS BEEN PRODUCED TO SHARE SOME STRATEGIES TO DO

JUST THAT.

TO ACHIEVE THE SPEED WE NEED WE MUST EXAMINE ALL ASPECTS OF THE

MASS DISPENSING CAMPAIGN, INCLUDING NONTRADITIONAL STRATEGIES

THAT USE MASS MEDIA AS THE FIRST LEVEL OF TRIAGE.

THEREBY, SPREADING TO THE MASCULINICS THOSE WHO ARE WELL, BUT

POTENTIALLY AT RISK AND DIRECTING TO HOSPITALS THOSE WHO HAVE

BECOME ILL.

ANOTHER STREAMLINING POSSIBILITY IS THE ELIMINATION OF SOME OF

THE STATIONS WITHIN THE PODs THAT CAUSE THE GREATEST BOTTLENECKS

AND LONGEST CUES.

WE'LL HEAR HOW A CLOSER COLLABORATION WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT DURING

THE RUNG OF PODs ASK INCLUDES THROUGHPUT, WHILE THE POSSIBILITY

OF PANIC AND DISORDER.

THESE STREAMLINING TECHNIQUES WILL HELP US MAXIMIZE EFFICIENCY,

AND CONSEQUENTLY, EFFECTIVENESS, IN BOTH THE SETUP AND THE

OPERATION OF OUR PODS.

IN TODAY'S BROADCAST, WE'LL EXAMINE TWO HIGH THROUGHPUT CLINIC

MODELS THAT WILL HELP US MOVE TOWARD A SUCCESSFUL 48-HOUR PODS SCENARIO.

FIRST, WE'LL LOOK AT THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.

PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS THERE PUT TOGETHER A LARGE POD EXERCISE

USING THE SMALLPOX MODEL WHILE ACTUALLY GIVING FLU VACCINATIONS.

BUT THREE DAYS BEFORE THE CLINIC WAS TO OPEN, THEY LEARNED THEY'D

HAVE TO SWITCH SITES.

AND TWO DAYS BEFORE THE OPENING, CDC MADE THE ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT

THIS SEASON'S FLU VACCINE SHORTAGE.

IN SPITE OF THESE LAST-MINUTE OBSTACLES, THE KENTUCKY PROGRAM HAD

GREAT SUCCESS BECAUSE ITS LEADERS HAD PLANNED FOR ADAPTABILITY,

AND THEIR PLANS INCLUDED SEVERAL SUCCESSFUL METHODS TO STREAMLINE

AND IMPROVE THEIR POD.

SECOND, WE'LL TURN TO HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, WHICH IS THE THIRD

MOST POPULATED COUNTY IN THE NATION.

A BUSY WORKDAY CAN SEE UP TO 6 MILLION PEOPLE IN HOUSTON AND ITS

SURROUNDING MUNICIPALITIES.

IT'S A STAGGERING NUMBER OF PEOPLE TO CONSIDER SENDING THROUGH

THE PODS, BUT WE'LL HEAR ABOUT STRATEGIES FOR MAKING IT WORK.

AND WE'LL LEARN TOGETHER HOW TO BEST APPLY THOSE PRACTICES IN

YOUR CITY AND STATE.

I'VE SAID BEFORE THAT WE HOPE THERE'S NEVER A NEED TO PUT THESE

PLANS INTO USE.

BUT IN HOPING FOR THE BEST, WE MUST PREPARE FOR THE WORST.

THIS BROADCAST IS DESIGNED TO HELP YOU PREPARE BY PROVIDING

PRACTICAL FIELD TEST AND STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE YOUR ABILITY TO

PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM HARM.

BY COLLABORATING CLOSELY ACROSS ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT

GOVERNMENT -- LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL, WE WILL BE PREPARED FOR

THE WORST.

AND OUR FAMILY, FRIENDS, AND NEIGHBORS WILL BE THE BENEFICIARIES

OF OUR DILIGENCE.

>> HELLO, AND WELCOME TO THIS INTERACTIVE SATELLITE BROADCAST,

"MASS ANTIBIOTIC DISPENSING STREAMLINING OPERATIONS."

I'M JOE WASHINGTON, YOUR MODERATOR FOR THIS PROGRAM, AND WE'RE

COMING TO YOU LIVE FROM THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND

PREVENTION IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA.

THANK YOU, DR. RAUB, FOR FRAMING THE ISSUE WE'LL BE EXAMINING TODAY.

WE'RE TAKING A CLOSE LOOK AT TWO DIFFERENT POD DESIGNS FROM

DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES.

IN BOTH WE'LL LEARN ABOUT SUCCESSFUL METHODS THEY'VE EMPLOYED TO

STREAMLINE THEIR POINTS-OF-DISPENSING.

THE DISPENSING PROCESS WOULD OCCUR IN THE EVENT OF A BIOTERRORISM

ATTACK, WHEN LIFE-SAVING PHARMACEUTICALS, ANTIDOTES, MEDICAL

SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED IN TIME TO PREVENT

ILLNESS AND SAVE LIVES.

THE CDC'S DIVISION OF STRATEGIC NATIONAL STOCKPILE, OR DSNS, IS

CHARGED WITH THE MISSION OF PROCURING, MAINTAINING, AND DEPLOYING

ALL OF THESE MATERIALS IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY.

DSNS ASSETS CAN REACH ANY AREA IN THE COUNTRY WITHIN 12 HOURS OR

LESS FROM THE FEDERAL DECISION TO DEPLOY, EVEN IF THERE ARE

MULTIPLE EVENTS.

STATE AND LOCAL PLANNERS HAVE TO BE READY TO PROVIDE MEDICATION

TO THE COMMUNITY WHEN THOSE SHIPMENTS ARRIVE.

AND THEY NEED TO DO IT IN TIME TO PROTECT PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT YET

BEEN AFFECTED.

AS DR. RAUB SAID, THAT WINDOW OF TIME COULD BE AS SHORT AS 48 HOURS.

SO WE FACE A CHALLENGING TASK.

BUT WE BELIEVE IT CAN BE DONE, AND TODAY WE'LL TALK ABOUT HOW.

WE WELCOME YOU, ALONG WITH OTHER KEY MEMBERS OF YOUR PLANNING

TEAM, TO THIS BROADCAST.

TODAY WE'LL TALK WITH DR. JACQUELYN MASON, THE CDC'S RESIDENT

EXPERT ON STREAMLINING POD SETUP AND OPERATIONS.

DR. MASON, YOU'RE HERE TO TELL US THAT WE CAN LOOK TO INDUSTRIAL

ENGINEERING CONCEPTS FOR SOME GOOD IDEAS.

YES, WE CAN LEARN A LOT JUST FROM PICTURING AN ASSEMBLY LINE, FOR INSTANCE.

IT PASSES ALONG WITHOUT MISSING A BEAT, BUT IT'S MOVING PRODUCTS,

NOT PEOPLE.

WE CAN'T BE AS FAST AS A MECHANIZED ASSEMBLY LINE, AND WE

WOULDN'T WANT TO BE, BUT WE CAN IMPROVE OUR NUMBER OF PATIENTS PER HOUR.

WE CAN DO IT BY TAILORING THE TECHNIQUES OF INDUSTRY, WHILE

KEEPING IN MIND THAT WE'LL BE DEALING WITH GREAT NUMBERS OF

WORRIED PEOPLE WHO DESERVE A PATIENT AND PROFESSIONAL POD

WORKFORCE.

>> THANKS, DR. MASON, AND WE'LL HEAR FROM DR. WILLIAM HACKER, THE

COMMISSIONER OF THE KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT FOR PUBLIC HEALTH.

DR. HACKER, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU CONDUCTED YOUR POD EXERCISE IN

SPITE OF SOME BIG OBSTACLES.

>> WELL, YOU HAVE TO PLAN FOR ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING.

BUT EVEN SO, WE COULDN'T HAVE ANTICIPATED THAT WE'D FACE THE

PARTICULAR CHALLENGES THAT WE DID.

BUT THAT'S ONE OF THE WAYS YOU GET PREPARED, YOU DEVELOP STRONG

PARTNERSHIPS IN ADVANCE.

WE IN PUBLIC HEALTH WERE FORTUNATE TO HAVE GREAT PARTNERS IN

LOCAL AND STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT, AS WELL AS WITH EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS AND OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS.

WE ALL WORKED IT OUT TOGETHER.

>> THANKS, DR. HACKER.

WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO HEARING HOW YOU PULLED IT OFF.

AFTER WE HEAR ABOUT KENTUCKY'S PROGRAM, WE'LL HEAR ABOUT A COUNTY

PROGRAM, AND NOT JUST ANY COUNTY, BUT ONE OF THE BIGGEST IN THE NATION.

DR. MATT MINSON IS HEAD OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND MEDICAL

REVIEW IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

DR. MINSON, THE IDEA OF PROVIDING PRETREATMENT TO MORE THAN 5

MILLION PEOPLE IS ALMOST MIND-BOGGLING!

>> WELL, AS DR. HACKER SAID, YOU JUST HAVE TO PLAN FOR IT.

I ADMIT, WE FACE A LARGE CHALLENGE, BUT WE DEVELOPED PLANS IN

ADVANCE TO SMOOTH OUT ALL THE ROUGH SPOTS WE COULD THINK OF.

WE KNEW ONE TASK WOULD BE TO FIND ENOUGH PEOPLE TO STAFF ALL THE

PODS WE'D NEED.

WE ALSO NEEDED TO FIGURE OUT BETTER WAYS TO COMMUNICATE

EFFECTIVELY WITH THE MANY PEOPLE WHO'D BE COMING THROUGH THE PODS.

>> THANKS, DR. MINSON, WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO HEARING MORE

ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE IN HARRIS COUNTY AS WELL AS DR. HACKER'S

EXPERIENCE IN KENTUCKY.

I WANT TO THANK ALL OF YOU FOR TAKING TIME OUT OF YOUR SCHEDULES

TO JOIN US TODAY.

IN THIS PROGRAM, WE'LL HEAR FROM OUR PRESENTERS ABOUT SPECIFIC

WAYS TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS PER HOUR, OR PPH, BY

IMPROVING THE PROCESSING OF PATIENTS THROUGH A POD.

TOWARD THE END OF THE BROADCAST, WE'LL LIST RESOURCES FOR MORE

INFORMATION, AND GATHER EVERYONE TOGETHER FOR AN IMPORTANT

QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION.

NOW LET'S LOOK AT THE OBJECTIVES FOR THIS PROGRAM.

AFTER VIEWING THIS BROADCAST, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO --

LIST THE GOALS OF A MASS ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS POD.

IDENTIFY THREE METHODS FOR INCREASING POD EFFECTIVENESS AND

EFFICIENCY.

IDENTIFY TWO WAYS TO INCREASE PATIENTS PER HOUR, OR PPH.

DEFINE "BALANCING THE LINE."

AND DETERMINE ONE METHOD FOR EVALUATING PROGRESS.

BEFORE WE GET UNDERWAY, IF YOU'RE HAVING TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES

DOWN LINKING OUR SIGNAL, CALL US RIGHT AWAY AT --

1-800-728-8232.

THAT'S 1-800-728-8232.

THIS PROGRAM CAN ALSO BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEALTH

TRAINING NETWORK WEBSITE AFTER TODAY THROUGH AN ARCHIVED WEB

CAST, AS WELL AS ON VIDEOTAPE AND CD-ROM WITHIN A FEW WEEKS.

SPECIFIC INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE PROGRAM WEBSITE.

A LISTING OF THE DSNS SERVICES CONSULTANTS CAN ALSO BE DOWNLOADED

FROM THIS WEBSITE.

AS I MENTIONED AT THE TOP OF THIS PROGRAM, THIS IS AN INTERACTIVE

BROADCAST.

WE WELCOME YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TOPICS PRESENTED TODAY.

THE LIVE QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION WILL HAPPEN RIGHT BEFORE THE

CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S PROGRAM, BUT I'M GOING TO GIVE OUT THOSE

PHONE NUMBERS NOW SO YOU'LL HAVE THEM READY FOR THE Q AND A.

WE CAN TAKE YOUR QUESTIONS BY PHONE, FAX, AND TTY SERVICE.

FOR REGULAR VOICE CALLS, THE NUMBER IS --

800-793-8598.

YOU CAN FAX YOUR QUESTION OR COMMENT TO US AT --

800-553-6323.

AND FINALLY, OUR TTY NUMBER IS --

800-815-8152.

PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THESE PUBLIC HEALTH TRAINING NETWORK NUMBERS

ARE ANSWERED ONLY DURING PHTN SATELLITE BROADCASTS, SO PLEASE DO

NOT ATTEMPT TO USE THEM AT OTHER TIMES.

REMEMBER, IF YOU'RE VIEWING THIS PROGRAM ON ANY DAY OTHER THAN

APRIL 14, 2005, YOU'RE WATCHING AN ARCHIVED REBROADCAST!

NOW LET'S TALK BRIEFLY ABOUT SOME OF THE TERMS WE'LL BE USING TODAY.

TO GUIDE US, WE GO BACK TO DR. JACQUELYN MASON, WHO IS AN

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC HEALTH READINESS

BRANCH AT THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HERE AT CDC.

DR. MASON, WALK US THROUGH THE TERMS AND THEIR DEFINITIONS SO

THAT WE ALL UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.

>> THANKS, JOE.

THE BEST PLACE TO START IS WITH THE TERM YOU USED JUST A FEW

MOMENTS AGO.

PPH, OR "PATIENTS PER HOUR," IS PRETTY SELF-EXPLANATORY, AS IT

DESCRIBES THE NUMBER OF PERSONS WHO ARE SUCCESSFULLY PUT THROUGH

THE POD IN ONE HOUR'S TIME.

WE'RE TALKING TODAY ABOUT WAYS TO INCREASE THIS NUMBER.

"EFFECTIVENESS" DESCRIBES HOW WELL A PROGRAM OR SERVICE IS ABLE

TO MEET ITS STATED GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.

LET'S SAY A REALISTIC GOAL IS TO PROVIDE PROPHYLAXIS TO 95% OF

THE TARGET POPULATION WITHIN 48 HOURS, AND WE GET ANTIBIOTICS TO 92%.

WE MIGHT DEEM THIS CAMPAIGN TO BE EFFECTIVE, SINCE WE REACHED 97%

OF OUR GOAL.

NOTE THAT "EFFECTIVENESS" IS OFTEN QUALITATIVELY DETERMINED.

"EFFICIENT" MEANS TO ACCOMPLISH A TASK WITH A MINIMUM OF EFFORT

AND WASTE.

IN THE CONTEXT OF MANAGING A POD, HAVING EFFICIENT OPERATIONS

MIGHT MEAN THAT POD WORKERS ARE KEPT BUSY PERFORMING THEIR

DESIGNATED TASKS, OR THAT CLIENT MOVEMENT THROUGH THE POD IS KEPT

AT A RELATIVELY CONSTANT LEVEL.

"EFFICIENCY" IS THE RATIO OF OUTPUTS TO INPUTS.

IT'S CALCULATED AS A PERCENTAGE AND IS DETERMINED USING THIS

SIMPLE FORMULA AS SHOWN HERE.

SAY, THAT, BASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS, YOU KNOW THAT A POD

SHOULD TYPICALLY PROVIDE PROPHYLAXIS TO 100 PEOPLE PER HOUR.

"100 PEOPLE PER HOUR" BECOMES YOUR INPUT.

IF A POD ACTUALLY SERVES 75 PEOPLE PER HOUR, THEN THAT NUMBER

BECOMES YOUR OUTPUT.

THE LABOR EFFICIENCY OF THIS SPECIFIC POD IS 75%.

"THROUGHPUT" IS A TERM DESCRIBING THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS THAT CAN

BE SERVICED IN THE POD SYSTEM, OR PORTION THEREOF, DURING A

SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME, WHEN THE SYSTEM IS WORKING AT FULL CAPACITY.

LINE BALANCING-ASSIGNING TASKS AMONG WORKERS THAT AN ASSEMBLY

LINE IS FACE STATIONS SO THAT PERFORMANCE TIMES ARE MADE AS EQUAL

AS POSSIBLE.

THE IDEA IS TO MINIMIZE IDLE TIME.

BALANCING THE LINE IS AN ONGOING PROCESS AND MAY REQUIRE ADDING,

SUBTRACTING, OR MOVING WORKERS AROUND WITHIN THE POD.

>> THANKS FOR THAT, DR. MASON.

IN LIGHT OF NEW INFORMATION ON BIOTERRORISM, PARTICULARLY

ANTHRAX, WE KNOW THAT COMMUNITIES OF ALL SIZES ARE ENCOURAGED TO

WORK TOWARD THE GOAL OF PROVIDING PROPHYLAXIS FOR THE TOTAL

POPULATION IN 48 HOURS.

TO DO THIS, STATE AND LOCAL PLANNERS MUST UTILIZE NEW WAYS TO SEE

MORE PATIENTS IN LESS TIME, WHILE STILL ADHERING TO CERTAIN

STANDARDS OF MEDICAL CARE.

SIMPLY PUT, WE NEED TO PUT PILLS IN MORE PEOPLE IN LESS TIME.

THIS BROADCAST HAS BEEN PRODUCED TO SHARE SOME STRATEGIES TO HELP DO THAT.

NOW THAT WE'VE ESTABLISHED WHAT WE NEED TO DO, LET'S GET DOWN TO

THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAYS TO MAKE IT HAPPEN.

WHAT DO WE NEED TO KNOW FIRST?

>> THERE ARE TWO AREAS WHERE IMPROVEMENTS TO STREAMLINE THE

PROCESS CAN BE MADE --

IN SETTING UP THE PODS AND IN OPERATING THE PODS.

FIRST, LET'S TALK ABOUT THE SET-UP OF THE PODS.

WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS A MASS DISPENSING APPROACH THAT IS VERY

CLOSE TO THE CONCEPT OF MASS PRODUCTION IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY.

THERE ARE CERTAIN PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES THAT PERTAIN TO

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING THAT ARE GERMANE TO THE DESIGN OF PODS.

SO WE'RE ADOPTING LESSONS LEARNED FROM INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING,

WHERE WE CAN GLEAN IMPORTANT LESSONS ABOUT HIGH VOLUME

PRODUCTION.

WE CAN ADAPT SIMPLE ASSEMBLY LINE CONCEPTS TO POD SET-UP AND

DESIGN THAT WILL IMPROVE EFFICIENCY, INCREASE THROUGHPUT AND SAVE

LIVES AND PREVENT ILLNESS IN THE PROCESS.

>> SO WE CAN SPEED UP THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS PER HOUR THROUGH

CHANGES IN SET-UP, BUT ALSO THROUGH OPERATION?

>> YES, WE CAN MAKE IMPROVEMENTS ON BOTH FRONTS -- THROUGH HOW WE

DESIGN THE PHYSICAL LAYOUT OF THE POD ITSELF AND THROUGH HOW WE

MAKE THE POD WORK.

FOR EXAMPLE, IF A POD IS DESIGNED SO THAT PATIENT FLOW MOVES IN

PARALLEL, OR MULTIPLE LINES, RATHER THAN IN A SINGLE LINE TO ONE

OR MORE STATIONS, THAT'S LIKELY TO INCREASE THROUGHPUT RATE.

ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT CAN BE DONE

OPERATIONALLY THAT WILL IMPACT THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS TREATED PER

HOUR, AND WE'LL GET TO THAT IN A MOMENT.

>> OKAY, FIRST LET'S START WITH THE DESIGN.

WHAT DO WE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT IMPROVING THE POD SET-UP?

>> TO UNDERSTAND WHERE TO MAKE THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WILL

INCREASE THE PPH, WE NEED TO LOOK FIRST AT THE TRADITIONAL

MEDICAL MODEL.

THIS REPRESENTS THE GENESIS OF POD DESIGN.

THIS MODEL IS BASED ON MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR TREATMENT BEING

CONDUCTED BY PHYSICIANS OR THEIR TRAINED ASSISTANTS.

SEVERAL ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLIE THE MEDICAL MODEL.

THE FIRST IS THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL IS UNIQUE, THEREFORE THE

TREATMENT GIVEN SHOULD BE BASED ON A PERSONALIZED MEDICAL

EVALUATION, EVEN WHEN THERE ARE ONLY ONE OR TWO TREATMENT OPTIONS

AVAILABLE.

THE SECOND IS THAT THERE ARE FEW OR NO CONSTRAINTS IN THE TYPE OF

MEDICAL STAFF AS WELL AS NO TIME CONSTRAINTS ON CONDUCTING

MEDICAL EVALUATIONS OR TREATMENTS.

THE THIRD ASSUMPTION OF THE MEDICAL MODEL OF POD DESIGN IS THAT

MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HAVE THE NECESSARY TRAINING TO PROVIDE

MEDICAL CARE BASED ON CURRENT, BEST MEDICAL PRACTICES.

THE MEDICAL MODEL IS WHAT'S TYPICALLY USED IN A TRADITIONAL

CLINICAL SETTING.

FRANKLY, IT'S WHAT WE'RE USED TO, AND IT'S WHAT MOST OF US ARE

MOST COMFORTABLE WITH.

BUT IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE NEEDING TREATMENT INCREASES

DRAMATICALLY, AS COULD BE THE CASE IN A BIOTERRORISM ATTACK OR

OTHER MAJOR DISASTER, THEN THE MEDICAL MODEL COULD BE

OVERWHELMED.

AND OF COURSE THERE WOULD BE SIGNIFICANT CONSTRAINTS ON THE

NUMBER OF TRAINED MEDICAL STAFF AVAILABLE TO PERFORM EVALUATIONS

AND ADMINISTER TREATMENT.

REMEMBER, THE APPROACH WE'D NORMALLY USE --

THE THOROUGH, INDIVIDUAL-BASED, MEDICAL PRACTICE APPROACH -- IS

NOT PRACTICAL IN DISASTER SITUATIONS INVOLVING MASS CASUALTIES

AND MASS NUMBERS OF PEOPLE NEEDING PREVENTIVE TREATMENT.

TODAY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TWEAKING THAT APPROACH SO THAT IT'S

BETTER SUITED FOR A MASS PREVENTION EVENT.

>> SO NOW WE'RE MOVING AWAY FROM THE TRADITIONAL MEDICAL MODEL TO

A MODIFIED VERSION THAT'S GOING TO WORK FASTER.

AND IF I UNDERSTAND YOU CORRECTLY, WE MIGHT HAVE TO SHORTEN THE

SCREENING PROCESS AND MAKE THE MEDICAL EVALUATIONS BRIEFER.

THAT'S A CAUSE FOR SOME CONCERN, ISN'T IT?

>> THE INTENTION IS NOT TO GIVE ANY PATIENT SHORT SHRIFT.

THE CORE ISSUE HERE IS THAT A FAILURE TO MODIFY THE TRADITIONAL

MEDICAL MODEL IS LIKELY TO RESULT IN LARGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE NOT

RECEIVING PRETREATMENT IN TIME TO BE SAFE.

REMEMBER, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT AN EMERGENCY MASS PREVENTION EFFORT.

IT'S VITAL THAT EVERY PERSON WHO NEEDS PRE-TREATMENT GETS IT.

THE ONES WHO DON'T COULD DIE.

IN THAT LIGHT, IT MAY BE PREFERABLE TO SLIGHTLY INCREASE

INDIVIDUAL RISK BY SHORTENING TRIAGE AND CONDUCTING MORE CURSORY

MEDICAL EVALUATIONS TO REDUCE OVERALL RISK IN THE POPULATION AS A WHOLE.

>> SO ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT A COMPLETE OVERHAUL OF EXISTING POD

DESIGN AND OPERATION?

>> ABSOLUTELY NOT.

THERE'S NO NEED FOR AN OVERHAUL BECAUSE OUR PODS HAVE ALREADY

BEEN MOVING IN THAT DIRECTION --

THAT IS, AWAY FROM THE TRADITIONAL MEDICAL MODEL.

IN FACT, I'D SAY THAT MOST OF THE PODS WE'VE DEVELOPED AND

TRAINED WITH UNTIL NOW HAVE NOT BEEN STRICT TRADITIONAL MEDICAL

MODELS AT ALL.

WE'VE BEEN STREAMLINING TO SOME DEGREE ALREADY.

SO INSTEAD OF LOW-FLOW TRADITIONAL MODELS WHICH WERE DESIGNED TO

SERVICE INDIVIDUALS, WE HAVE BEEN USING WHAT WE MIGHT CALL

MEDIUM-FLOW MODELS --

A MODIFIED MEDICAL MODEL SUCH AS WAS USED IN THE 2001 ANTHRAX ATTACKS.

WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TODAY IS FURTHER MODIFYING THAT MODEL TO

TAKE US TO A HIGH-FLOW POD MODEL CAPABLE OF TREATING VERY LARGE

NUMBERS OF PATIENTS.

>> IT'S CLEAR FROM WHAT YOU'RE SAYING THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A

PARADIGM SHIFT.

IT'S A VERY DIFFERENT APPROACH, ISN'T IT?

>> YES, IT IS, BUT THE SHIFT IS NECESSARY.

IN CLINICAL MEDICINE, YOU HAVE NORMAL THINGS YOU DO TO EVALUATE

PATIENTS, EVEN DURING AN EMERGENCY.

BUT THERE ARE DIFFERENT RULES IN A MASS CASUALTY SITUATION.

YOU SIMPLY DON'T HAVE THE TIME OR RESOURCES TO DO IT THAT WAY.

WE NEED TO MAKE THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN MEDICAL PRACTICE AND MASS

PROPHYLAXIS.

PUBLIC HEALTH DOESN'T USUALLY@ THINK IN TERMS OF A MASS

PREVENTION INITIATIVE, SO IT'S AN EFFORT TO SHIFT FROM THINKING

ABOUT NORMAL PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIVITIES TO A MASS PREVENTIVE EFFORT.

THE UNDERLYING INTENT FOR BOTH IS STILL PREVENTION.

>> THAT'S A KEY POINT.

EVEN THOUGH OUR APPROACH TO DESIGNING AND OPERATING PODS IS

SHIFTING, THE GOAL IS TO PREVENT DISEASE AND DEATH, JUST AS IT IS

IN OUR DAILY PUBLIC HEALTH WORK.

>> OKAY, LET'S START BY TAKING A LOOK AT THE MODEL WE'VE USED

UNTIL NOW.

>> THIS IS A GENERIC POD MODEL THAT CONTAINS MANY OF THE CONCEPTS

ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRADITIONAL MEDICAL MODEL.

THE STATIONS SHOWN HERE ARE GENERALLY REPRESENTATIVE OF A POD

SET-UP WHEN THERE ARE A CONSIDERABLE NUMBER OF PEOPLE TO BE

TREATED AND THERE ARE ADEQUATE RESOURCES, MOSTLY HEALTH STAFF, TO

OPERATE THE CLINIC OR CLINICS.

THE STATIONS ARE --

NUMBER ONE, TRIAGE --

WHERE, AS THEY MIGHT SAY IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, ALL THE

SORTING HAPPENS.

IN OUR CASE, IT'S DETERMINING IF THE PEOPLE WHO ARRIVE FOR

TREATMENT ARE IN THE PLACE THEY NEED TO BE.

THE NEXT STATION, NUMBER TWO, IS PICK-UP FORMS AND INFORMATION SHEETS.

THEN, ON TO NUMBER THREE --

ORIENTATION.

STATION NUMBER FOUR IS FILLING OUT THE FORMS.

NUMBER 5 IS THE INITIAL MEDICAL SCREENING.

THIS IS ACTUALLY THE SECOND SCREENING OF THE PROCESS, BUT IT'S

THE FIRST MEDICAL SCREENING.

PATIENTS CAN THEN GO ON TO STATION 6, YET ANOTHER MEDICAL

SCREENING WHERE THEY MIGHT BE SENT DIRECTLY TO A HEALTHCARE FACILITY.

OR BE SENT DIRECTLY TO STATION SEVEN, QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW,

IN WHICH A TRAINED PROFESSIONAL LOOKS OVER THE PATIENT'S

PAPERWORK TO ENSURE THAT EVERYTHING IS PROPERLY SIGNED AND MAKES

SURE THE PATIENT HAS BEEN PROPERLY CLEARED TO RECEIVE THE

PROPHYLAXIS.

AND THEN ON TO GET THEIR MEDICATION AT STATION EIGHT.

AND FINALLY TO NINE, THE LAST STATION, WHERE TRACKING INFORMATION

IS COMPLETED AND THE PATIENT EXITS.

ALTHOUGH THIS GENERIC MODEL CONTAINS MANY OF THE ELEMENTS OF A

TYPICAL POD, I AM IN NO WAY SUGGESTING THAT IS THE ONLY WAY PODS

HAVE BEEN DESIGNED.

>> LET'S LOOK FOR A MOMENT AT A LIST OF THE FUNCTIONS YOU'VE JUST

DESCRIBED.

WHAT ARE SOME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LOW-FLOW AND MEDIUM-FLOW MODELS?

>> ONE DIFFERENCE HAS TO DO WITH THE NUMBER AND TYPE OF PEOPLE

WHO STAFF THE RESPECTIVE CLINICS.

IN THE LOW-FLOW MODEL, ONE OR TWO HIGHLY TRAINED PROFESSIONALS,

FOR EXAMPLE A PHYSICIAN OR NURSE PRACTITIONER AND PHYSICIAN'S

ASSISTANT, PERFORM ITEMS 1, 2, 4, AND 5.

IN THE MEDIUM-FLOW MODEL, EACH OF THESE FUNCTIONS MAY BE CARRIED

OUT BY DIFFERENT PEOPLE, SOME OF WHICH ARE TRAINED MEDICAL

PROFESSIONALS AND SOME WHO ARE LIKELY TO BE NON-MEDICAL STAFF,

OFTEN VOLUNTEERS.

IN THE TERMS OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, THE SERVICE PROCESS OF

TREATING A PATIENT HAS UNDERGONE A DIVISION OF LABOR.

IT'S BEEN DIVIDED INTO SEVERAL SMALLER JOBS, SO THAT IDENTIFIABLE

TASKS CAN BE PERFORMED BY INDIVIDUAL WORKERS IN A REPETITIVE

FASHION, MUCH LIKE WORKERS ON AN ASSEMBLY LINE.

CLEARLY, THE SKILL SET REQUIRED BY EACH INDIVIDUAL STAFF AT EACH

STATION IN THE MEDIUM FLOW MODEL IS LESS THAN WHAT IS REQUIRED IN

THE CLINICAL MODEL.

>> LET'S GO BACK TO THE ASSEMBLY LINE ANALOGY TO IDENTIFY SEVERAL

IMPORTANT IDEAS FOR MAKING PODS MORE EFFICIENT.

>> FIRST, THE POD SHOULD BE SETUP TO DISPENSE MEDICATIONS TO ALL

WHO NEED IT USING AS FEW STAFF AS REASONABLY REQUIRED.

SO WE WANT THE STAFF TO BE ABLE TO ADEQUATELY PERFORM THE JOB

AT-HAND, BUT WE DON'T WANT TOO MANY STAFF, WHICH WOULD RESULT IN

IDLE TIME.

WHEN THEY DO THIS IN INDUSTRY IT'S KNOWN AS "BALANCING THE LINE."

BALANCING THE LINE IN A SERVICE OPERATION SUCH AS A POD MEANS

ENSURING A CONSTANT MOVEMENT OF PATIENTS THROUGH THE SYSTEM.

THE GOAL IS TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE "BOTTLENECKS."

A BOTTLENECK IS A STATION WHERE THERE IS BACKLOG OF PATIENTS

BECAUSE THEY ARRIVE FASTER THAN THEY'RE SERVED.

WHEN THAT HAPPENS, IT LEADS TO STAFF AT THE BOTTLENECKED STATION

WORKING NON-STOP, AND MAY RESULT IN THE UNDERUTILIZATION OF STAFF

WORKING DOWNSTREAM OF THE BOTTLENECK.

REMEMBER, HOWEVER, THAT IF YOU RELIEVE A BOTTLENECK AT ONE

STATION BY MOVING STAFF AROUND, IT MAY LEAD TO BOTTLENECKS IN

OTHER PARTS OF THE POD, SO BALANCING THE LINE IS LIKELY TO BE AN

ONGOING PROCESS.

OUR GUESTS FROM KENTUCKY AND TEXAS WILL BE GIVING US SOME

REAL-LIFE EXAMPLES OF BALANCING THE LINE AND RELIEVING

BOTTLENECKS IN JUST A FEW MINUTES.

>> AND THEY ARE NOT ALONE IN ADOPTING STREAMLINING TECHNIQUES, ARE THEY?

>> THAT'S CORRECT.

A NUMBER OF PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCIES ARE MOVING TOWARD A HIGH-FLOW

OR MASS DISPENSING POD MODEL.

TAKING A MASS DISPENSING APPROACH IS COMPARABLE TO MASS

PRODUCTION IN THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR.

THE UNDERLYING CONCEPT IS THAT LARGE NUMBERS, WHETHER WE'RE

TALKING PEOPLE OR PARTS, ARE PASSED FROM POINT-TO-POINT OR

STATION-TO-STATION.

GETTING AS MANY PEOPLE THROUGH THE POD AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE SO

THAT WE CAN TREAT EVERYONE IN THE SPECIFIED WINDOW OF TIME IS THE GOAL.

TO USE ANOTHER INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IDEA, WE WANT THE POD TO

HAVE A HIGH THROUGHPUT RATE.

ONE WAY TO INCREASE PPH IS TO RELAX OUR CURRENT STANDARDS.

FOR EXAMPLE, SHORTENING OR FOREGOING ORIENTATION, SIMPLIFYING

MEDICAL FORMS, ELIMINATING SECONDARY MEDICAL SCREENING, OR

ABOLISHING THE QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECK ARE ALL STEPS THAT MAY BE

TAKEN TO INCREASE OVERALL CLINIC THROUGHPUT RATE.

ANOTHER STRATEGY FOR INCREASING THE PPH IS TO SEND PATIENTS WHO

EITHER CANNOT BE TREATED OR WHO REQUIRE ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT

OPTIONS TO REMOTE STATIONS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE POD.

WE CAN ALSO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS TREATED PER HOUR BY

HAVING PROCESSES IN PLACE TO DEAL WITH OR REMOVE PATIENTS WHO

POTENTIALLY WOULD SLOW DOWN CLINIC OPERATIONS DUE TO THE FACTORS

THAT ARE NOT MEDICALLY RELATED.

EXAMPLES OF SUCH PATIENTS INCLUDE THOSE THAT EXHIBIT DISRUPTIVE

BEHAVIOR, ARE PHYSICALLY DISABLED, ARE FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE,

AND DO NOT SPEAK ENGLISH.

A FOURTH METHOD IS TO IDENTIFY THE BOTTLENECKS IN THE SYSTEM --

THE PLACES WHERE PEOPLE WAIT IN LONG LINES OR QUEUES --

AND ADD ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO HELP RELIEVE THE BOTTLENECKS.

DOING THESE THINGS WILL SERVE TO IMPROVE POD OPERATIONS BY

REDUCING OR EVEN ELIMINATING PATIENT PROCESSING TIMES, ENABLING

STANDARDIZATION WITHIN POD OPERATIONS, AND INCREASING THROUGHPUT.

>> LET'S TURN NOW TO FIND OUT HOW ONE STATE HAS ENACTED A

STREAMLINED POD MODEL.

AND THEY DID IT FACING A COUPLE OF 11TH-HOUR ROADBLOCKS THAT APPEARED.

DR. WILLIAM HACKER, SET THE STAGE FOR US IN KENTUCKY.

>> WELL, KENTUCKY IS A MID-SIZED STATE OF ABOUT 4 MILLION PEOPLE.

WE HAVE THREE MODERATELY URBAN AREAS WITH THE REST OF THE

POPULATION LIVING IN RURAL AREAS, AND OUR CENTRAL LOCATION IN THE

COUNTRY MAKES US A MAJOR TRANSPORTATION AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY HUB.

LIKE MANY OTHER STATES AND CITIES, WE STARTED PLANNING BACK IN

AUGUST FOR THE VACCINATION PLANS.

IN OUR CASE WE PLANNED TO EXERCISE IN TAYLOR COUNTY, A SMALL

COUNTY OF ABOUT 10,000 PEOPLE IN THE SOUTH-CENTRAL PART OF THE STATE.

THE LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT DID THE VACCINATION CLINIC USING THE

SMALLPOX MODEL BUT WITH FLU SHOTS.

TWO DAYS BEFORE THE CLINIC, THE CDC ANNOUNCED THE FLU VACCINE SHORTAGE.

IMMEDIATELY, WE WENT TO LOCAL BROADCAST MEDIA TO ANNOUNCE A

CHANGE IN PLANS.

WE'D ALREADY BEEN WORKING CLOSELY WITH THEM TO PUBLICIZE THE FLU CLINICS.

NOW WE NEEDED THEM TO LET THE PUBLIC KNOW THAT ONLY THOSE IN THE

HIGH-RISK POPULATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE CDC SHOULD SHOW UP.

>> THAT'S A SIGNIFICANT ADJUSTMENT TO MAKE IN SUCH A SHORT TIME.

BUT YOU WERE ALREADY DEALING WITH ANOTHER SET-BACK IN TERMS OF

LOCATION, WEREN'T YOU?

>> YES, THE DAY BEFORE THE CDC ANNOUNCED THE SHORTAGE OF FLU

VACCINES, WE LEARNED THAT THE SCHOOL GYMNASIUM WHERE WE'D PLANNED

TO SET UP OUR POD HAD JUST BEEN GIVEN A BRAND NEW FLOOR, AND WE

WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO WORK ON IT.

WE MADE THE DECISION TO STAY AT THE SCHOOL BUT USE THE CAFETERIA INSTEAD.

THAT MEANT CHANGING THE CONFIGURATION AND FLOW OF OUR POD TO FIT

THE NEW PHYSICAL SPACE.

SO WE WERE DEALING WITH THAT WHEN WE GOT WORD THAT ONLY HIGH-RISK

PATIENTS COULD GET FLU SHOTS.

SO THESE TWO ISSUES TOGETHER FORCED US TO ADAPT VERY QUICKLY.

>> SO YOU CHANGED LOCATIONS WITH JUST A COUPLE OF DAYS TO SPARE,

AND THEN YOU HAD TO USE THE MEDIA TO LET THE PUBLIC KNOW THAT

ONLY HIGH-RISK POPULATIONS IDENTIFIED BY CDC SHOULD COME TO THE CLINIC.

>> RIGHT.

AND THAT WAS DIFFICULT BECAUSE WE'D ALREADY BEEN USING THE MEDIA

TO GET ANY ANYBODY AND EVERYBODY TO THE CLINIC, SO THE MEDIA

MESSAGE CHANGED DRAMATICALLY.

IT APPEARED TO WORK THOUGH, AND WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF A VERY

SUCCESSFUL EXERCISE.

>> SO HOW DID YOU STREAMLINE YOUR SET-UP AND OPERATIONS?

>> WE IMPLEMENTED THREE OVERALL APPROACHES TO STREAMLINING OUR POD.

THE FIRST WAS THAT INSTEAD OF HAVING PATIENTS COME THROUGH ONE AT

A TIME, WE HAD THEM GO THROUGH IN GROUPS OF 60.

IT WAS A CONTINUOUS PROCESS, AND IT WORKED BETTER FOR US BECAUSE

THEY COULD ALL GET THEIR EDUCATION AS A GROUP.

AND WE FOUND THAT 60 PEOPLE MOVING THROUGH THE POD TOGETHER WENT

FASTER THAN 60 INDIVIDUALS MOVING THROUGH THE POD SEPARATELY.

AS TIME WENT ON, WE ADJUSTED THE NUMBERS IN EACH GROUP TO

FACILITATE THE BEST MOVEMENT THROUGH THE POD.

THE SECOND THEME FOR STREAMLINING OUR APPROACH WAS THAT WE

BALANCED THE LINE AS EVENTS UNFOLDED.

THIS INVOLVED LOOKING FOR POTENTIALLY DISRUPTIVE PATIENTS AND

PULLING THEM OUT OF THE LINE FOR SPECIAL ATTENTION, JUST AS DR.

MASON DESCRIBED A FEW MINUTES AGO.

IT REDUCED THE POSSIBILITY OF PANIC AND CONFLICT, AND IT SERVED

TO CALM THE OTHER PEOPLE IN LINE.

THE THIRD STREAMLINING APPROACH WAS TO CONSISTENTLY MONITOR THE

STAFF AND MOVE THEM AS NEEDED TO MAKE THE MOST EFFICIENT USE OF

THEIR TIME.

>> BUT HOW DID YOU KNOW THOSE THREE APPROACHES WOULD WORK?

>> WE CAME TO THOSE CONCLUSIONS THANKS TO DISCUSSIONS WE HAD

PRIOR TO THE EXERCISE WITH ALL PARTNERS AND VOLUNTEERS.

WE MET WITH EVERYONE TWICE, SO BY THE TIME OF THE EXERCISE

EVERYONE KNEW THEIR ROLES, AND ALL OUR EFFORTS WERE DEVELOPED TO

MEET THE EXERCISE OBJECTIVES WE LAID OUT.

>> LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THOSE OBJECTIVES NOW.

WILL YOU WALK US THROUGH THEM, PLEASE?

>> SURE.

THE FIRST OBJECTIVE WAS TO DETERMINE THE PREPAREDNESS OF THE

COMMUNITY -- IN THIS CASE TAYLOR COUNTY -- TO RESPOND TO AN

INFECTIOUS DISEASE OUTBREAK.

THE SECOND OBJECTIVE WAS TO TEST THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE

CAPABILITIES OF THE COUNTY'S ELECTED OFFICIALS, EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT,

EMS, MEDIA, PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATIONS AS

OUTLINED IN THE COUNTY'S EMERGENCY OPERATION PLAN.

THE THIRD WAS TO TEST THE PLAN BY DEMONSTRATING AN ABILITY TO

ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT AN APPROPRIATE INCIDENT/UNIFIED COMMAND SYSTEM.

THE FOURTH OBJECTIVE WAS TO TEST THE EMERGENCY OPERATION PLAN BY

DEMONSTRATING EFFECTIVE INTERAGENCY COORDINATION OF INFORMATION.

OBJECTIVE FIVE WAS TO EXERCISE OUR PUBLIC INFORMATION PLAN.

OBJECTIVE SIX WAS TO EXERCISE DEPLOYMENT OF THE STOCKPILE.

AND THE FINAL OBJECTIVE WAS TO TEST THE COUNTY'S INFECTIOUS

DISEASE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN.

THESE OBJECTIVES DROVE THE ENTIRE PROCESS.

>> YOUR EXERCISE WAS A SUCCESS, BUT YOU WERE SO SUCCESSFUL, YOU

ENDED UP BEING HANDED AN EVEN BIGGER TASK, DIDN'T YOU?

>> YES.

THE DISTRICT HEALTH DIRECTOR THOUGHT THAT SINCE WE DID SUCH A

GOOD JOB IN ONE COUNTY THAT WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO THE SAME FOR

EVERY COUNTY IN THE REGION -- ALL AT THE SAME TIME.

SO JUST TEN DAYS AFTER THE TAYLOR COUNTY EXERCISE, WE DUPLICATED

OUR MODEL IN NINE OTHER COUNTIES.

IT WAS QUITE AN UNDERTAKING, BUT WE DID IT BY STICKING TO OUR

MODEL WHICH HAD WORKED SO WELL IN TAYLOR COUNTY.

WORKERS FROM THE NINE OTHER COUNTIES HAD PARTICIPATED IN THE

FIRST EXERCISE, AND THEY WENT BACK HOME AND TAUGHT WORKERS THERE

WHAT TO DO.

>> AND HOW DID THE EXERCISE GO IN THOSE NINE COUNTIES?

>> OVERALL, VERY WELL.

THERE WERE A COUPLE OF GLITCHES.

ONE OF THE SITES DIDN'T HAVE ADEQUATE LAW ENFORCEMENT, SO THE

LINE OF PATIENTS TENDED TO BLOCK THE POD ENTRANCE.

ONE PATIENT SPENT ALL NIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT JUST TO GET HIS SHOT.

THIS COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED HAD THERE BEEN BETTER EFFECTIVE

PUBLIC INFORMATION.

THESE WERE RELATIVELY MINOR INCIDENTS AND THEY PROVIDED SOME GOOD

LESSONS LEARNED.

>> LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT KENTUCKY AND SOME OF THE KEY PLAYERS.

>> HERE IN KENTUCKY WE BASICALLY HAVE 4 MILLION PEOPLE.

MOSTLY WE'RE A RURAL COMMUNITY.

THERE'S LOTS OF FARMING.

WE HAVE TWO MAJOR INDUSTRIAL, METROPOLITAN CITIES, LEXINGTON AND

LOUISVILLE.

I THINK LOUISVILLE HAS 250,000 PEOPLE, BUT MOST OF IT IS, THERE'S

A LOT OF FARM AND A LOT OF MOUNTAINS IN THE EASTERN KENTUCKY

AREAS THAT ARE VERY, VERY RURAL AND EVEN HERE IN FRANKFURT, IN

THE STATE CAPITAL, THERE'S JUST 40, 44,000 PEOPLE IN THE WHOLE

COUNTY HERE.

WHAT WE DID HERE IN KENTUCKY TO MEET THE GOALS FOR THE REGIONAL

PLANNING AND ALSO TO TIE THAT TOGETHER WITH OUR CDC INITIATIVES

AND THE CRITICAL BENCH MARX, KENTUCKY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

ALREADY HAD ESTABLISHED WHAT WE CALL AREA MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS.

WE PAIRED OUR DISTRICT UP ON THE SAME BOUNDARIES.

THESE FOLKS ARE CHARGED WITH WRITING REGIONAL PLANS AND WE'RE

ALSO EMPLOYING ALL OF THE CDC CLINICAL CAPACITIES IN THAT.

WHAT WE DID HERE IN KENTUCKY, WE REALIZED THAT EVERY INCIDENT

HAPPENS ON THE LOCAL LEVEL AND THE FIRST RESPONSE HAS TO BE FROM

THE LOCAL LEVEL.

SO WE HAVE TAKEN A VERY SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF OUR MONEY, PUBLIC

HEALTH MONEY, CDC MONEY AND PUT OUT ON THE LOCAL LEVEL TO FUND

PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS PLANNERS.

WE FEEL, HERE IN KENTUCKY, THAT THE MAJOR PART OF THE PLANNING

HAS TO BE DONE AT THE LOCAL LEVEL WHERE THE RUBBER HITS THE ROAD.

>> THE INITIAL TRAINING WE GOT THAT WAS URBAN ORIENTED, THE BIG

DIFFERENCE WAS THE RESOURCES THAT THEY HAD AT THEIR DISPOSAL

VERSUS THE RESOURCES WE HAD AND WITH THE TRAININGS WE WERE SEEING

WHOLE TEAMS OF INDIVIDUALS COMING OUT IN THE MOON SUITS AND WE

SAW LOTS OF SECURITY AND LOTS OF POLICE AND IN A RURAL AREA

YOU'VE GOT VERY SMALL POLICE FORCE.

YOU DON'T HAVE THAT SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT.

YOU DON'T HAVE THOSE RESOURCES AT YOUR DISPOSAL.

SO WE HAD TO COME UP WITH A WAY TO USE RESOURCES THAT WE HAD IN

AN EFFECTIVE WAY TO ACHIEVE THE OUTCOMES WE WERE LOOKING FOR.

>> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT MADE THIS CLINIC SUCCESSFUL WAS THAT

LAW ENFORCEMENT, THE DAY BEFORE, ACTUALLY WALKED THROUGH THE

WHOLE HIGH SCHOOL AND THEY DETERMINED HOW THEY WOULD CONTROL

PATIENT FLOW.

THEY'RE USED TO CROWD CONTROL.

SO WE NEEDED THEIR EXPERTISE AND WE FOLLOWED THEIR DECISIONS ON

CONTROLLING PATIENT FLOW.

>> THE CLINIC WAS NOT JUST OPEN TO PEOPLE JUST TO FLOOD THROUGH.

THEY ACTUALLY LOCKED IT DOWN AND THEY CONTROLLED THE ACCESS AND

LET SO MANY PEOPLE IN AT A TIME.

>> TO MOVE THE LINE, WE LET PEOPLE IN 60 AT A TIME.

WE ALTERNATED THE ROTATION OF THOSE PEOPLE SO WE HAD A CONTINUOUS

LINE MOVING TO THE PROPHYLAXIS AREA.

SO THAT WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL IN GETTING THAT CLINIC AND KEPT THE

LINE MOVING.

SO EVEN THE PEOPLE WHO WERE COMPLETELY IN THE BACK OF THE LINE

OUTSIDE WERE MOVING FORWARD AT A QUICK PACE.

ONCE WE GOT THEM INTO THE BUILDING, THE POLICEMEN AND LAW

ENFORCEMENT LET THEM INTO THE BUILDING, WE WOULD GIVE THEM A

SCREENING FORM AND THEY WENT INTO A TEN-MINUTE EDUCATION VIDEO.

WE EDUCATED THEM ON THE PROPHYLAXIS THEY WOULD RECEIVE.

WE HAD NURSES IN THERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND TO HELP THEM

FILL OUT THE FORMS.

>> I'M SURPRISED WE ACTUALLY SIMULATED A NATIONAL STRATEGIC

STOCKPILE MOVEMENT, IN SOMERSET AND TRANSPORTED THE SUPPLIES HERE.

WHILE HERE, WE HAD RED BINS THAT WE FOUND TO BE INVALUABLE AND WE

PUT SUPPLIES IN THAT AND WE PUT IT UNDERNEATH EACH TABLE.

SO AS THEY NEEDED MORE SUPPLIES THE CLERK AT THE STATION COULD

RESUPPLY THE NURSES AND KEEP THEM MOVING.

>> ONCE THEY RECEIVED THEIR PROPHYLAXIS, THEY WENT TO A PATIENT

WAITING AREA.

WE HAD THEM WAIT FOR 20 MINUTES.

WHILE THEY WERE WAITING WE HAD TELEVISIONS GOING WITH A

POWERPOINT PRESENTATION THAT PRESENTED PATIENT EDUCATION, WHAT TO

DO AFTER THEY RECEIVED THEIR PROPHYLAXIS.

IF THEY HAD ANY PROBLEM, WHO TO CALL.

THE OTHER THING THAT MADE THIS CLINIC SO SUCCESSFUL IS THE CLINIC

AS A WHOLE PLANNED THE CLINIC.

IT WASN'T JUST PUBLIC HEALTH.

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HEALTH PLAN POLICE, SHERIFFS, EVEN THE MAYOR

PROVIDED INPUT AND THE CORONER PROVIDED INPUT ON HOW TO GET THESE

PEOPLE INTO THE PROPHYLAXIS.

>> EVERYBODY HAD A HAND.

>> WE WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR SETTING UP THE CLINIC PART OF THE

OPERATION.

I WAS ACTUALLY THE CHAIRPERSON AT THE INCIDENT COMMAND CENTER AND

WORKED WITH THE BIOTERRORISM PREPAREDNESS PLANNERS IN DEVELOPING

JOB DESCRIPTIONS FOR EACH ROLE THAT WE WERE GOING TO HAVE THAT DAY.

WE ACTUALLY PREPARED WRITTEN DESCRIPTIONS TO HAND OUT DURING OUR

BRIEFING SESSION SO THAT EACH PERSON HAD SOMETHING IN FRONT OF

THEM AND VIEWED WHAT THEIR ROLL AND POSITION WOULD BE FOR THE DAY.

>> WE DID A SETUP THE DAY BEFORE AND CAME THAT MORNING AND DID

THE FINAL PREPARATIONS.

THERE WERE PEOPLE HERE WHEN WE GOT HERE.

THE POLICE WERE HERE TO DO CROWD CONTROL.

THE COMMUNITY WAS WONDERFUL, I THOUGHT, PEOPLE WERE STANDING IN

LINE HELPING ONE ANOTHER.

EVER