CDC logo
Safer Healthier People
CDC Home CDC Search CDC Health Topics A-Z
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Skip navigation links Search NIOSH  |  NIOSH Home  |  NIOSH Topics  |  Site Index  |  Databases and Information Resources  |  NIOSH Products  |  Contact Us

Search for NIOSH Publications: NIOSHTIC-2

NIOSHTIC-2 Search Results

      Advanced Search  |  Help  |  About  |  Feedback 
Terms: radiation
6 - 6 of 1227 Bibliographic entries
Save All   |   Save Page
View Saved    |    Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.
Back to Results
Risk of leukaemia mortality from exposure to ionising radiation in US nuclear workers: a pooled case-control study.
Authors
Daniels-RD; Bertke-S; Waters-KM; Schubauer-Berigan-MK
Source
Occup Environ Med 2013 Jan; 70(1):41-48
Link
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2012-100906 
NIOSHTIC No.
20041530 
Abstract
Objective: To follow-up on earlier studies of the leukaemogenicity of occupational ionising radiation exposure. Methods: We conducted a nested case-control analysis of leukaemia mortality in a pooled cohort of US nuclear workers followed through 2005. Each case was matched to four controls on attained age. Exposures were estimated from available records. General relative risk models were used to estimate the excess relative risk (ERR) of leukaemia, excluding chronic lymphocytic (CLL), acute myeloid leukaemia, chronic myeloid leukaemia and CLL while controlling for potential confounders. Preferred exposure lags and time-windows of risks were calculated using joint maximum likelihood. Dose-response was also examined using linear, linear-quadratic, categorical and restricted cubic spline models. Results: There were 369 leukaemia deaths in 105 245 US nuclear workers. The adjusted ERR for non-CLL leukaemia was 0.09 (95% CI -0.17 to 0.65) per 100 mGy. Elevated non-CLL risks were observed from exposures occurring 6-14 years prior to attained age of cases (ERR per 100 mGy=1.9; 95% CI <0 to 8.0). Lagged models indicated non-linearity of risk at very low (<10 mGy) and high (>100 mGy) doses, which contributed to the imprecision of results in linear models. Similar risk attenuation was not evident in time-windowsbased models. Conclusions: Risk estimates were in reasonable agreement with previous estimates, with the temporality of non-CLL leukaemia risk as a dominant factor in dose response analyses. Future research should focus on methods that improve evaluations of the dose-response, particularly in the low-dose range.
Keywords
Leukemogenesis; Ionizing-radiation; Exposure-levels; Case-studies; Mortality-rates; Morbidity-rates; Nuclear-energy; Nuclear-hazards; Workers; Work-environment; Risk-factors; Dose-response
Contact
Dr Robert D. Daniels, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies (DSHEFS), Industrywide Studies Branch (IWSB), 4676 Columbia Parkway, Mailstop R-13, Cincinnati, OH 45226
CODEN
OEMEEM
Publication Date
20130101
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
rtd2@cdc.gov
Fiscal Year
2013
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
B10152012
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
1351-0711
NIOSH Division
DSHEFS
Priority Area
Manufacturing
Source Name
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
State
OH
Page 6 of 1227

File Formats Help:

Adobe PDF file
How do I view different file formats (PDF, DOC, PPT, MPEG) on this site?double arrows.