CDC logo
Safer Healthier People
CDC Home CDC Search CDC Health Topics A-Z
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Skip navigation links Search NIOSH  |  NIOSH Home  |  NIOSH Topics  |  Site Index  |  Databases and Information Resources  |  NIOSH Products  |  Contact Us

Search for NIOSH Publications: NIOSHTIC-2

NIOSHTIC-2 Search Results

      Advanced Search  |  Help  |  About  |  Feedback 
Terms: glutaraldehyde
2 - 2 of 60 Bibliographic entries
Save All   |   Save Page
View Saved    |    Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.
Back to Results
Chemical assessment of "In-Use" allergic contact dermatitis patch test reagents from dermatology clinics.
Authors
Siegel-PD; Fowler-JF; Law-BF; Warshaw-EM; Taylor-JS
Source
Toxicologist 2013 Mar; 132(1):306-307
Link
http://www.toxicology.org/ms/AMpubs.asp 
NIOSHTIC No.
20042429 
Abstract
Epicutaneous patch tests (EPT) are commonly used to identify chemical agents of allergic contact dermatitis in dermatology patients. Test validity and assessment of allergic reaction severity are highly dependent on the use of reliable chemical allergen test reagents. The purpose of the present study was to measure the actual concentration of nickel sulfate (NiSO4), methyl methacrylate (MM), formaldehyde (FA) and glutaraldehyde (GA) compared to the labeled concentrations of commercial reagents found in dermatology clinics where patch testing is routinely performed. The commercial reagents, NiSO4, MM and GA are supplied either dissolved or suspended in petrolatum (usually in syringe, multiuse containers) while FA is diluted in water. Participating clinics submitted in-date and out-dated reagents to the laboratory for analyses. Both NiSO4 and FA levels were at or above the labeled concentration. NiSO4 particulate was uniformly distributed throughout the petrolatum. In contrast, MM was low and variable in commercial allergen reagents. "In-use" MM reagent syringes were all = / < 56% of the 2% label concentration with no observable relationship to expiration date. One MM syringe purchased directly from the manufactured was 70% of the labeled concentration. Lower MM levels in syringes were consistently measured at the tip vs. plunger end of the syringe suggesting loss due to MM’s volatility. GA patch test reagents concentrations ranged from 27 to 45% of the labeled (1% in petrolatum) amount, independent of expiration date. No GA concentration pattern between tip and plunger was observed. These data suggest that false negative EPT results may be due to instability of volatile or self-polymerizing chemical allergens in the test reagents.
Keywords
Toxicology; Patch-tests; Dermatology; Dermatitis; Allergic-dermatitis; Allergic-reactions; Allergens; Reaction-rates; Reagents; Nickel-compounds; Sulfates; Methyl-compounds; Methacrylates; Formaldehydes; Aldehydes; Testing-equipment; Medical-equipment; Diagnostic-tests; Clinical-tests; Skin; Skin-tests; Skin-sensitivity; Volatiles; Contact-allergies; Contact-dermatitis
CAS No.
7786-81-4; 80-62-6; 50-00-0; 111-30-8
Publication Date
20130301
Document Type
Abstract
Fiscal Year
2013
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
B20130502
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
1096-6080
NIOSH Division
HELD
Source Name
The Toxicologist. Society of Toxicology 52nd Annual Meeting and ToxExpo, San Antonio, Texas, March 10-14, 2013
State
WV; KY; MN; OH; TX
Page 2 of 60

File Formats Help:

Adobe PDF file
How do I view different file formats (PDF, DOC, PPT, MPEG) on this site?double arrows.