CDC logoSafer Healthier People  CDC HomeCDC SearchCDC Health Topics A-Z
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Skip navigation links Search NIOSH  |  NIOSH Home  |  NIOSH Topics  |  Site Index  |  Databases and Information Resources  |  NIOSH Products  |  Contact Us

Search for NIOSH Publications: NIOSHTIC-2

NIOSHTIC-2 Search Results

      Advanced Search  |  Help  |  About  |  Feedback 
Terms: effects of alternative fuels 1 - 1 of 6 Bibliographic entries
Save All   |   Save Page View Saved    |    Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.

 1 Effectiveness of selected diesel particulate matter control technologies for underground mining applications: isolated zone study, 2004
Authors Bugarski-AD; Schnakenberg-GH; Mischler-SE; Noll-JD; Patts-LD; Hummer-JA 
Source NIOSH 2006 Aug; :1-67 
Link http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/pubs/pubreference/outputid2094.htm 
NIOSHTIC No. 20030929 
AbstractThe National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health conducted a study to determine the effects of selected, state-of-the-art emission control technologies on the ambient concentrations of particulate matter and gases emitted by underground diesel-powered mining equipment. Tests were conducted in an isolated zone of an underground mine to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative fuel formulations, namely, water-fuel emulsions, blended biodiesel fuels, ultralow sulfur diesel fuel, and #1 diesel; and selected exhaust after treatment devices, namely, diesel oxidation catalysts (DOCs), diesel particulate filter (DPF) systems, and filtration systems designed around high-temperature disposable filter elements. The results showed that using a cold-weather and warm-weather water-fuel emulsion formulation reduced mass concentrations of elemental carbon (EC) by about 70% and 85%, respectively. The 20% and 50% soy biodiesel blends reduced EC by 49% and 66%, respectively. The reductions were slightly less pronounced for the 20% and 50% yellow grease biodiesel blends-33% and 56%, respectively. EC concentrations were unaffected by using ultralow sulfur diesel in place of #1 diesel. Use of the reformulated fuels did not substantially alter the concentrations of nitric oxide and carbon monoxide. However, a measurable increase in the nitrogen dioxide (NO2) peak concentration was observed during the biodiesel tests. The ArvinMeritor (AM) fuel-burner DPF system with a palladium-catalyzed DOC reduced EC concentrations by 92%. The diesel filter elements from Donaldson Co., Inc., and Filter Service & Testing Corp. reduced the EC concentration of the mine air by 92% and 70%, respectively. When the palladium-based DOC was used with the AM DPF, it raised the average and peak downstream NO2 concentrations by a factor of three. Tests of the AM DPF system with a platinum-catalyzed DOC and CAP/ETG catalytic particulate oxidizer system had to be terminated because the elevated NO2 concentrations threatened to overexpose the operator. The tests with only a selected DOC also resulted in increased NO2 concentrations in mine air. 
KeywordsMining-industry; Underground-mining; Metal-mining; Diesel-emissions; Diesel-engines; Diesel-exhausts; Particulates; Aerosols; Occupational-health; Occupational-hazards; Health-hazards; Filtration; Filters; Ventilation; Mining-equipment; Carcinogens; Hydrocarbons 
ContactNIOSH Pittsburgh Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 
CAS No.10102-44-0; 10102-43-9; 7440-06-4; 7782-44-7; 630-08-0; 124-38-9 
Publication Date20060801 
Document TypeNumbered Publication; Report of Investigations 
Fiscal Year2006 
NTIS Accession No.PB2007-101023 
NTIS PriceA06 
Identifying No.(NIOSH) 2006-138; RI-9668 
NIOSH DivisionPRL 
Priority AreaResearch Tools and Approaches: Control Technology and Personal Protective Equipment 
Source NameNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
StatePA 
Page 1 of 6