CDC logoSafer Healthier People  CDC HomeCDC SearchCDC Health Topics A-Z
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Skip navigation links Search NIOSH  |  NIOSH Home  |  NIOSH Topics  |  Site Index  |  Databases and Information Resources  |  NIOSH Products  |  Contact Us

Search for NIOSH Publications: NIOSHTIC-2

NIOSHTIC-2 Search Results

      Advanced Search  |  Help  |  About  |  Feedback 
Terms: 20022435 1 - 1 of 1 Bibliographic entries All record(s) shown.
Save All   |   Save Page View Saved    |    Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.

 1 Comparison of six quantitative fit test methods using full facepiece respirators with a measurement of exposure
Authors Coffey-CC; Zhuang-Z; Lawrence-RB; Jenson-PA 
Source J Int Soc Respir Prot 2002 Spring/Summer; 19(1-2):20-36 
Link http://www.isrp.com.au/ 
NIOSHTIC No. 20022435 
AbstractA study is described comparing fit factors from six quantitative fit-tests for full facepiece respirators to the concentration of 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (FreonŽ-113) in the wearer's end-exhaled breath during a 30-minute simulated workplace test. The methods were: (1) continuous high flow, deep probe, generated aerosol (CHD); (2) continuous low flow, flush probe, generated aerosol (CLF); (3) controlled negative pressure (CNP); (4) long duration (30 minute) ambient aerosol (AAlong); (5) short duration (8 minute) ambient aerosol (AA); and (6) high-flow, deep probe, 8 minute duration ambient aerosol (HDAA). The first two methods utilized corn oil and a forward light scattering photometer. The CNP used the Occupational Health Dynamics Fit Tester 3000. The last three used the TSI PortaCount Plus. The method fit factors were then individually correlated with the FreonŽ-113 exposures using the coefficient of determination, r2. The potential for FreonŽ-113 being absorbed through the skin and eliminated in the exhaled breath was also evaluated. The study found (1) for all methods except the controlled negative pressure method, a statistically significant correlation was found between total FreonŽ-113 exposure dose and method fit factors (r2 values were: AAlong = 0.26, AA = 0.11, HDAA = 0.10, CHD = 0.09, CLF = 0.20, CNP =< 0.01); (2) the amount of FreonŽ-113 in the exhaled breath due to skin absorption ranged from 0.03 to 0.52 parts per million (ppm) with a mean of 0.16 ppm; and (3) approximately 24 percent of all end-exhaled air samples were less than the limit of detection. 
KeywordsAir-purifying-respirators; Time-weighted-average-exposure; Testing-equipment; Respiration; Respirators; Respiratory-protective-equipment; Laboratory-testing; Equipment-design; Equipment-reliability; Exposure-methods; Breathing; Face-masks; Leak-detectors; Leak-prevention; Fluorocarbons; Statistical-analysis; Skin-absorption; Quantitative-analysis; Organic-vapors; Aerosol-generators; Aerosol-sampling; Aerosols 
ContactNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26505-2888, USA 
Publication Date20020301 
Document TypeJournal Article 
Fiscal Year2002 
NTIS Accession No. 
NTIS Price 
Issue of Publication1-2 
ISSN0892-6298 
NIOSH DivisionDRDS; NPPTL 
Priority AreaResearch Tools and Approaches: Control Technology and Personal Protective Equipment 
Source NameJournal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection 
StateWV 
Page 1 of 1
All record(s) shown.