CDC logo
Safer Healthier People
CDC Home CDC Search CDC Health Topics A-Z
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Skip navigation links Search NIOSH  |  NIOSH Home  |  NIOSH Topics  |  Site Index  |  Databases and Information Resources  |  NIOSH Products  |  Contact Us

Search for NIOSH Publications: NIOSHTIC-2

NIOSHTIC-2 Search Results

      Advanced Search  |  Help  |  About  |  Feedback 
Terms: 20022401
1 - 1 of 1 Bibliographic entries
All record(s) shown.
Save All   |   Save Page
View Saved    |    Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.
Back to Results
Anthropometric differences among occupational groups.
Authors
Hsiao-H; Long-D; Snyder-K
Source
Ergonomics 2002 Feb; 45(2):136-152
Link
http://www.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&issn=0014-0139&volume=45&issue=2&spage=136 
NIOSHTIC No.
20022401 
Abstract
The increasing demands for anthropometric information for the design of machinery and personal protective equipment to prevent occupational injuries has necessitated an understanding of the anthropometric differences to be found among occupations. This study identified differences in various body measurements between occupational groups in the USA, as determined in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Approximately 16,000 of its 32,900 subjects were associated with an occupational group. The analysis of the data showed that the body size, or body segment measurements, of some occupational groups differ significantly. For example, agricultural workers were shorter by an average of 2.5 cm in height, and had wider wrist breadths, than other workers. Female agricultural and manufacturing workers had larger waist circumferences than those in the 'other occupations' and 'all occupations' categories. Protective service workers (i.e. firefighters, police and guards) were taller and heavier (7 kg heavier for males and over 10 kg heavier for females) than those in all occupations combined. These differences and other deviations as well as some age-and-ethnicity-adjusted results were tabulated for users' reference. Researchers and designers who use anthropometric databases to evaluate human-machine interfaces and personal protective equipment (PPE) must use caution in selecting databases that are adequate for their occupational applications.
Keywords
Anthropometry; Personal-protective-equipment; Machine-operation; Occupational-hazards; Body-protection; Agricultural-workers; Fire-fighters; Police-officers; Age-groups; Racial-factors; Humans; Construction-workers
Contact
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Safety Research, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
CODEN
ERGOAX
Publication Date
20020210
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
hhsiao@cdc.gov
Fiscal Year
2002
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
2
ISSN
0014-0139
NIOSH Division
DSR
Priority Area
Research Tools and Approaches: Control Technology and Personal Protective Equipment
Source Name
Ergonomics
State
WV
Page 1 of 1
All record(s) shown.

File Formats Help:

Adobe PDF file
How do I view different file formats (PDF, DOC, PPT, MPEG) on this site?double arrows.