CDC logoSafer Healthier People  CDC HomeCDC SearchCDC Health Topics A-Z
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Skip navigation links Search NIOSH  |  NIOSH Home  |  NIOSH Topics  |  Site Index  |  Databases and Information Resources  |  NIOSH Products  |  Contact Us

Search for NIOSH Publications: NIOSHTIC-2

NIOSHTIC-2 Search Results

      Advanced Search  |  Help  |  About  |  Feedback 
Terms: 20020850 1 - 1 of 1 Bibliographic entries All record(s) shown.
Save All   |   Save Page View Saved    |    Download
Select check boxes to automatically save entries, or use 'save all' or 'save page' links above.

 1 A prospective study of back belts for prevention of back pain and injury
Authors Wassell-JT; Gardner-LI; Landsittel-DP; Johnston-JJ; Johnston-JM 
Source JAMA J Am Med Assoc 2000 Dec; 284(21):2727-2732 
Link http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/21/2727 
NIOSHTIC No. 20020850 
AbstractDespite scientific uncertainties about effectiveness, wearing back belts in the hopes of preventing costly and disabling low back injury in employees is becoming common in the workplace. To evaluate the effectiveness of using back belts in reducing back injury claims and low back pain. Prospective cohort study. From April 1996 through April 1998, we identified material-handling employees in 160 new retail merchandise stores (89 required back belt use; 71 had voluntary back belt use) in 30 states (from New Hampshire to Michigan in the north and from Florida to Texas in the south); data collection ended December 1998, median follow-up was 6(1/2) months. A referred sample of 13,873 material handling employees provided 9377 baseline interviews and 6311 (67%) follow-up interviews; 206 (1.4%) refused baseline interview. Incidence rate of material-handling back injury workers' compensation claims and 6-month incidence rate of self-reported low back pain. Neither frequent back belt use nor a belt-requirement store policy was significantly associated with back injury claim rates or self-reported back pain. Rate ratios comparing back injury claims of those who reported wearing back belts usually every day and once or twice a week vs those who reported wearing belts never or once or twice a month were 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.70) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.56-1.59), respectively. The respective odds ratios for low back pain incidence were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.83-1.13) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.73-1.16). In the largest prospective cohort study of back belt use, adjusted for multiple individual risk factors, neither frequent back belt use nor a store policy that required belt use was associated with reduced incidence of back injury claims or low back pain. 
KeywordsBack-injuries; Injuries; Injury-prevention; Musculoskeletal-system-disorders; Musculoskeletal-system; Skeletal-system-disorders; Skeletal-system; Protective-clothing; Protective-equipment; Personal-protective-equipment; Materials-handling; Manual-materials-handling; Manual-lifting 
CODENJAMAAP 
Publication Date20001206 
Document TypeJournal Article 
Fiscal Year2001 
NTIS Accession No. 
NTIS Price 
Issue of Publication21 
ISSN0098-7484 
NIOSH DivisionHELD; DSR 
Source NameJournal of the American Medical Association 
StateWV 
Page 1 of 1
All record(s) shown.