CDC logoSafer Healthier People  CDC HomeCDC SearchCDC Health Topics A-Z
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Skip navigation links Search NIOSH  |  NIOSH Home  |  NIOSH Topics  |  Site Index  |  Databases and Information Resources  |  NIOSH Products  |  Contact Us

 NIOSH Publication No. 2004-146

Worker Health Chartbook 2004

 Worker Health Chartbook > Chapter 2 > Nonfatal Injuries > Cuts and Lacerations
Chapter 2: Fatal and Nonfatal Injuries, and Selected Illnesses and Conditions

Cuts and Lacerations

Cuts and lacerations constituted the major category of traumatic injury among the 150,376 open-wounds injury cases reported in 2001. Cut and laceration cases are less severe than the average nonfatal injury or illness case. They involved a median of 3 days away from work in 2001 compared with 6 days for all nonfatal injuries and illnesses (Figure 2–123) [BLS 2003a].

BLS reported 114,791 cut and laceration cases involving days away from work in 2001 (Figure 2–118). Rates declined 44.5% during 1992–2001, from 22.7 per 10,000 workers in 1992 to 12.6 in 2001 (Figure 2–119). Most cases involved workers who were aged 25–54 (69.4%) (Figure 2–120), male (81.9%) (Figure 2–121), and white, non-Hispanic (60.7%) (Figure 2–122). Together, two occupational groups accounted for more than 67% of cut and laceration cases: operators, fabricators, and laborers (40.0%) and precision production, craft, and repair (27.2%) (Figure 2–124). Rates exceeding the private-sector rate were reported for construction (35.8 per 10,000 full-time workers), agriculture, forestry, and fishing (26.5), manufacturing (16.1), and retail trade (15.4) (Figure 2–125). Two industry sectors (construction and agriculture, forestry, and fishing) had consistently higher annual rates of cut and laceration cases than other sectors during 1992–2001, and they experienced reductions of 26.3% and 41.2%, respectively (Figure 2–126).

Magnitude and Trend
How did the number of cut and laceration cases change during 1992–2001?
How did the annual rate of cut and laceration cases change during 1992–2001?
chart thumbnail - click on image for larger view.
Age
How did cut and laceration cases compare with all nonfatal injury and illness cases by age of worker in 2001?
chart thumbnail - click on image for larger view.
Sex
How did cut and laceration cases compare with all nonfatal injury and illness cases by sex of worker in 2001?
chart thumbnail - click on image for larger view.
Race/Ethnicity
How did cut and laceration cases compare with all nonfatal injury and illness cases by race/ethnicity in 2001?
chart thumbnail - click on image for larger view.
Severity
How did cut and laceration cases compare with all nonfatal injury and illness cases when measured by days away from work in 2001?
chart thumbnail - click on image for larger view.
Occupation
How did cut and laceration cases compare with all nonfatal injury and illness cases by occupation in 2001?
chart thumbnail - click on image for larger view.
Industry
How did the rate of cut and laceration cases differ by private industry sector in 2001?
chart thumbnail - click on image for larger view.
How did the rates of cut and laceration cases change by private industry sector during 1992–2001?
chart thumbnail - click on image for larger view.
chart thumbnail - click on image for larger view.
left arrow Nonfatal Injuries - Heat Burns and Scalds Nonfatal Injuries - Fractures right arrow